UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional and Q audit was performed involving 255 HFs selected by proportional allocation and systematic random sampling. Data was collected using a structured pretested questionnaire with HF managers being the respondents. Data were analysed using IBM ® SPSS® (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 21.0) where univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analysis was done with the level of significance set at <0.05.
UNASSIGNED: Overall adherence to recommended strategies, structures, and programs for HBV prevention among the HFs was generally low, with a mean score of 37.02 (95% CI = 33.98-40.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the level of adherence between the HF categories (F = 9.698; P = <0.001). Being a hospital (OR = 3.9: CI = 1.68-9.29), possessing infection, prevention and control (IPC) guidelines (OR = 6.69: CI = 3.29-13.63) as well as having functional IPC committees in place (OR = 7.9: CI = 3.59-17.34) were associated with good adherence to HF-level HBV preventive strategies.
UNASSIGNED: Overall adherence to HF-level prevention of HBV is sub-optimal. Higher-level facilities were better resourced with HBV vaccine and Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG). Adherence to HBV prevention strategies depends on the type of HF and the availability of IPC committees and their respective IPC coordinators.
■进行了横截面和Q审核,涉及通过比例分配和系统随机抽样选择的255个HF。使用结构化的预测试问卷收集数据,其中HF经理为受访者。使用IBM®SPSS®(社会科学统计软件包,版本21.0),其中单变量,双变量,多变量分析的显著性水平设置为<0.05。
■总体上遵守推荐的策略,结构,和计划中的乙肝病毒预防的HFs普遍较低,平均得分为37.02(95%CI=33.98-40.05)。HF类别之间的依从性水平有统计学上的显着差异(F=9.698;P=<0.001)。作为医院(OR=3.9:CI=1.68-9.29),有感染,预防和控制(IPC)指南(OR=6.69:CI=3.29~13.63)以及设立了功能性IPC委员会(OR=7.9:CI=3.59~17.34)与HF水平HBV预防策略的良好依从性相关.
■对HBV的HF水平预防的总体依从性是次优的。较高级别的设施获得了更好的HBV疫苗和乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白(HBIG)资源。坚持HBV预防策略取决于HF的类型和IPC委员会及其各自的IPC协调员的可用性。