关键词: COVID-19 critical care etomidate outcome postintubation hypotension

Mesh : Humans Middle Aged Aged Etomidate / adverse effects Retrospective Studies Critical Illness Intubation, Intratracheal / adverse effects COVID-19 Hypotension / chemically induced

来  源:   DOI:10.1177/08850666231173847   PDF(Pubmed)

Abstract:
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the association of etomidate with postintubation hypotension, inflammation, and mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
METHODS: International, multicenter, retrospective study.
METHODS: Critically ill patients hospitalized specifically for COVID-19 from three major academic institutions in the US and Europe.
METHODS: Patients were allocated into the etomidate (ET) group or another induction agent (OA) group. The primary outcome was postintubation hypotension. Secondary outcomes included postintubation inflammatory status, in-hospital mortality, and mortality at 30 days.
RESULTS: 171 patients with a median age of 68 (IQR 58-73) years were included (ET, n  =  98; OA, n  =  73). Etomidate was associated with lower postintubation mean arterial pressure [74.33 (64-85) mm Hg versus 81.84 (69.75-94.25) mm Hg, p  =  0.005] compared to other agents. No statistically significant differences were generally observed in inflammatory markers between the two groups at 7- and 14-days after admission to the intensive care unit. In-hospital mortality [77 (79%) versus 41 (56%), p  =  0.003] and mortality at 30-days [78 (80%) versus 43 (59%), p  =  0.006] were higher in the ET group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only etomidate (p  =  0.009) and postintubation mean arterial pressure (p < 0.001) had a statistically significant effect on mortality, in contrast to stress-dose steroids (p  =  0.301), after adjusting for creatinine (p  =  0.695), blood urea nitrogen (p  =  0.153), age (p  =  0.055), oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SpO2) (p  =  0.941), and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (p  =  0.712).
CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a single-bolus dose of etomidate in critically ill patients with COVID-19 is associated with lower postintubation mean arterial pressure and higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality compared to other induction agents.
摘要:
为了评估依托咪酯与插管后低血压的关系,炎症,COVID-19危重患者的死亡率。
方法:国际,多中心,回顾性研究。
方法:来自美国和欧洲三大学术机构的因COVID-19而住院的重症患者。
方法:将患者分为依托咪酯(ET)组或其他诱导剂(OA)组。主要结果是插管后低血压。次要结果包括插管后炎症状态,住院死亡率,和30天的死亡率。
结果:纳入171例中位年龄为68(IQR58-73)岁的患者(ET,n=98;OA,n=73)。依托咪酯与插管后平均动脉压较低相关[74.33(64-85)mmHg与81.84(69.75-94.25)mmHg,与其他试剂相比,p=0.005]。在入住重症监护病房后7天和14天,两组之间的炎症标志物通常没有观察到统计学上的显着差异。住院死亡率[77(79%)对41(56%),p=0.003]和30天死亡率[78(80%)对43(59%),p=0.006]在ET组中较高。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,只有依托咪酯(p=0.009)和插管后平均动脉压(p<0.001)对死亡率有统计学意义的影响,与应激剂量类固醇相反(p=0.301),校正肌酐后(p=0.695),血尿素氮(p=0.153),年龄(p=0.055),血红蛋白氧饱和度(SpO2)(p=0.941),和吸入氧的分数(FiO2)(p=0.712)。
结论:与其他诱导剂相比,在COVID-19危重患者中单次推注依托咪酯与插管后平均动脉压较低、住院时间和30天死亡率较高相关。
公众号