Abstract：
BACKGROUND: The study was conducted on patients who received diagnostic X-rays in King Khalid Hospital (KKH), Majmaah.
BACKGROUND: The study included the seven most frequently performed investigations, which were carried out on over 1504 patients using digital radiography equipment.
METHODS: The X-ray tube\'s output and exposure parameters were used to calculate the effective dose (ED) and patient entry surface air kerma (ESAK). Additionally, based on these results, conversion coefficients were determined. This study also examined the 75th percentile distributions of ESAK and KAP. The findings of this research were compared with the findings of other researchers throughout the country and the world. The study presents the uncertainty U values, as well as the mean ESAK, KAP, and ED values.
RESULTS: The results of the ESAK, KAP, and ED values were 0.12-5.74 mGy, 0.9-1.84 Gy cm2, and 0.01-0.23 mSv, respectively. As a result, the dosages were much lower than those previously published for the European DRL, national standards, and other studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that during dose surveys, the importance of detecting and comprehending radiation doses, as well as the proper technique for taking the finest photos possible, can be emphasized to patients in order to assist them in avoiding radioactive particles and radiation exposure.
BACKGROUND: The study included the seven most frequently performed investigations, which were carried out on over 1504 patients using digital radiography equipment.
METHODS: The X-ray tube\'s output and exposure parameters were used to calculate the effective dose (ED) and patient entry surface air kerma (ESAK). Additionally, based on these results, conversion coefficients were determined. This study also examined the 75th percentile distributions of ESAK and KAP. The findings of this research were compared with the findings of other researchers throughout the country and the world. The study presents the uncertainty U values, as well as the mean ESAK, KAP, and ED values.
RESULTS: The results of the ESAK, KAP, and ED values were 0.12-5.74 mGy, 0.9-1.84 Gy cm2, and 0.01-0.23 mSv, respectively. As a result, the dosages were much lower than those previously published for the European DRL, national standards, and other studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that during dose surveys, the importance of detecting and comprehending radiation doses, as well as the proper technique for taking the finest photos possible, can be emphasized to patients in order to assist them in avoiding radioactive particles and radiation exposure.
摘要：
背景：这项研究是针对在哈立德国王医院（KKH）接受诊断X射线的患者进行的，Majmaah.
背景：该研究包括七个最常见的调查，这是使用数字射线照相设备对1504名患者进行的。
方法：使用X射线管的输出和暴露参数来计算有效剂量（ED）和患者进入表面空气角膜（ESAK）。此外,基于这些结果，转换系数确定。这项研究还检查了ESAK和KAP的第75百分位数分布。将这项研究的发现与全国和世界各地的其他研究人员的发现进行了比较。这项研究提出了不确定度U值，以及平均ESAK，KAP,和ED值。
结果：ESAK的结果，KAP,ED值为0.12-5.74mGy，0.9-1.84Gycm2和0.01-0.23mSv，分别。因此,剂量远低于以前为欧洲DRL发布的剂量，国家标准,和其他研究。
结论：该研究得出结论，在剂量调查期间，探测和理解辐射剂量的重要性，以及拍摄最好的照片的适当技术，可以向患者强调，以帮助他们避免放射性粒子和辐射暴露。
背景：该研究包括七个最常见的调查，这是使用数字射线照相设备对1504名患者进行的。
方法：使用X射线管的输出和暴露参数来计算有效剂量（ED）和患者进入表面空气角膜（ESAK）。此外,基于这些结果，转换系数确定。这项研究还检查了ESAK和KAP的第75百分位数分布。将这项研究的发现与全国和世界各地的其他研究人员的发现进行了比较。这项研究提出了不确定度U值，以及平均ESAK，KAP,和ED值。
结果：ESAK的结果，KAP,ED值为0.12-5.74mGy，0.9-1.84Gycm2和0.01-0.23mSv，分别。因此,剂量远低于以前为欧洲DRL发布的剂量，国家标准,和其他研究。
结论：该研究得出结论，在剂量调查期间，探测和理解辐射剂量的重要性，以及拍摄最好的照片的适当技术，可以向患者强调，以帮助他们避免放射性粒子和辐射暴露。
