Abstract：
This research aims to explore the factors affecting the intervention of health-care professionals regarding a radiological event and to determine what actions they cause. In line with the keywords determined, a search was conducted on Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed until March 2022. Eighteen peer-reviewed articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. This systematic review was conducted using the PICOS and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses)guidelines. Of the 18 studies included in the study, 8 were cross-sectional studies, 7 were descriptive studies, 2 were interventional studies, and 1 was a systematic review. As a result of the qualitative analysis, 7 factors affecting the intervention of health-care professionals in a radiological event were identified as follows: rarity of the event; inadequacy of health-care professionals against the radiological event; sensory responses; dilemma and ethical concern; communication, workload; and other factors. The most important factor affecting the intervention of health-care professionals in a radiological event is inadequate education about a radiological event, which influences the formation of other factors. These and other factors cause actions such as delayed treatment, death, and disruption of health services. Further studies are needed on the factors affecting the intervention of health-care professionals.
摘要：
这项研究旨在探讨影响卫生保健专业人员对放射事件的干预的因素，并确定它们引起的行动。根据确定的关键字，对Cochrane进行了搜查,Scopus,WebofScience,和PubMed直到2022年3月。审查了18篇符合纳入标准的同行评审文章。本系统评价使用PICOS和PRISMA（系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目）指南进行。在这项研究中包含的18项研究中，8个是横断面研究，7是描述性研究，2是介入研究，1是系统审查。作为定性分析的结果，确定了影响卫生保健专业人员在放射事件中干预的7个因素：事件的稀有性；卫生保健专业人员对放射事件的不足；感官反应；困境和道德关注；沟通，工作量；以及其他因素。影响卫生保健专业人员介入放射事件的最重要因素是放射事件教育不足,影响其他因素的形成。这些和其他因素导致的行动，如延迟治疗，死亡,以及卫生服务的中断。需要进一步研究影响卫生保健专业人员干预的因素。
