PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Plantar fasciitis (PF) can be treated effectively with manual techniques like cryostretch (CS) and the positional release technique (PRT). Although Gua Sha (GS) has been suggested in the literature for PF, its efficacy has not been studied in the research.
UNASSIGNED: To determine and compare the effectiveness of GS, CS, and PRT in subjects with PF in terms of pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, and foot function.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-six patients with PF (n=36) were randomly allocated to three study groups (12 in each group)-group GS, group CS, and group PRT, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at physiotherapy OPD in a tertiary health center.
UNASSIGNED: Subjects of all genders with plantar fasciitis of the age group 20-60 years. Thirty-six subjects with plantar fasciitis out of whom 12 were males and 24 females. There were no dropouts in this study.
UNASSIGNED: The interventions included the Gua Sha technique (1 session), the cryostretch technique with a frozen tennis ball (3 sessions), and the positional release technique (7 sessions), along with common exercises for all three groups.
UNASSIGNED: Pain intensity, foot functions, and pain pressure threshold were assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Foot Function Index, and pressure algometer, respectively, on day 1 (pre-intervention) and day 7 (post-intervention).
UNASSIGNED: Between-group analyses showed that group GS was more effective than CS and PRT for pain (p=.0001), group CS was more effective than GS and PRT for foot function (p=.0001) whereas group PRT was more effective than GS and CS for pain pressure threshold (p=.0001).
UNASSIGNED: Although all three groups showed improvement, Gua Sha was superior in terms of reducing pain, cryostretch for improving foot functions, and PRT for reducing tenderness. The interventions used in this study are cost-effective and have proved to be simple and safe techniques.
UNASSIGNED: To determine and compare the effectiveness of GS, CS, and PRT in subjects with PF in terms of pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, and foot function.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-six patients with PF (n=36) were randomly allocated to three study groups (12 in each group)-group GS, group CS, and group PRT, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at physiotherapy OPD in a tertiary health center.
UNASSIGNED: Subjects of all genders with plantar fasciitis of the age group 20-60 years. Thirty-six subjects with plantar fasciitis out of whom 12 were males and 24 females. There were no dropouts in this study.
UNASSIGNED: The interventions included the Gua Sha technique (1 session), the cryostretch technique with a frozen tennis ball (3 sessions), and the positional release technique (7 sessions), along with common exercises for all three groups.
UNASSIGNED: Pain intensity, foot functions, and pain pressure threshold were assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Foot Function Index, and pressure algometer, respectively, on day 1 (pre-intervention) and day 7 (post-intervention).
UNASSIGNED: Between-group analyses showed that group GS was more effective than CS and PRT for pain (p=.0001), group CS was more effective than GS and PRT for foot function (p=.0001) whereas group PRT was more effective than GS and CS for pain pressure threshold (p=.0001).
UNASSIGNED: Although all three groups showed improvement, Gua Sha was superior in terms of reducing pain, cryostretch for improving foot functions, and PRT for reducing tenderness. The interventions used in this study are cost-effective and have proved to be simple and safe techniques.
摘要：
UNASSIGNED：可以通过冷冻拉伸（CS）和位置释放技术（PRT）等手动技术有效治疗足底筋膜炎（PF）。尽管GuaSha（GS）已在文献中提出用于PF，其疗效尚未在研究中进行研究。
UNASSIGNED：要确定和比较GS的有效性，CS,和PRT在PF受试者的疼痛强度方面，疼痛压力阈值，和脚的功能。
UNASSIGNED：将36例PF患者（n=36）随机分为三个研究组（每组12例）-GS组，组CS,和PRT组，分别。
UNASSIGNED：在三级卫生中心的物理治疗OPD中进行了一项随机临床试验。
UNASISIGNED：年龄在20-60岁的所有性别的足底筋膜炎患者。36名患有足底筋膜炎的受试者，其中男性12名，女性24名。这项研究中没有辍学。
未经评估：干预措施包括瓜沙技术（1次），冷冻网球的冷冻拉伸技术(3次)，和位置释放技术(7个会议)，以及所有三组的常见练习。
未经证实：疼痛强度，足部功能,和疼痛压力阈值使用数字疼痛评定量表进行评估，脚功能索引，和压力计，分别,在第1天（干预前）和第7天（干预后）。
UNASSIGNED：组间分析显示，GS组比CS和PRT对疼痛更有效（p=0.0001），对于足部功能，CS组比GS和PRT更有效（p=0.0001），而对于疼痛压力阈值，PRT组比GS和CS更有效（p=0.0001）。
UASSIGNED：虽然三组都有改善，瓜沙在减轻疼痛方面更胜一筹，冷冻拉伸改善足部功能，和PRT减少压痛。这项研究中使用的干预措施具有成本效益，并且已被证明是简单安全的技术。
UNASSIGNED：要确定和比较GS的有效性，CS,和PRT在PF受试者的疼痛强度方面，疼痛压力阈值，和脚的功能。
UNASSIGNED：将36例PF患者（n=36）随机分为三个研究组（每组12例）-GS组，组CS,和PRT组，分别。
UNASSIGNED：在三级卫生中心的物理治疗OPD中进行了一项随机临床试验。
UNASISIGNED：年龄在20-60岁的所有性别的足底筋膜炎患者。36名患有足底筋膜炎的受试者，其中男性12名，女性24名。这项研究中没有辍学。
未经评估：干预措施包括瓜沙技术（1次），冷冻网球的冷冻拉伸技术(3次)，和位置释放技术(7个会议)，以及所有三组的常见练习。
未经证实：疼痛强度，足部功能,和疼痛压力阈值使用数字疼痛评定量表进行评估，脚功能索引，和压力计，分别,在第1天（干预前）和第7天（干预后）。
UNASSIGNED：组间分析显示，GS组比CS和PRT对疼痛更有效（p=0.0001），对于足部功能，CS组比GS和PRT更有效（p=0.0001），而对于疼痛压力阈值，PRT组比GS和CS更有效（p=0.0001）。
UASSIGNED：虽然三组都有改善，瓜沙在减轻疼痛方面更胜一筹，冷冻拉伸改善足部功能，和PRT减少压痛。这项研究中使用的干预措施具有成本效益，并且已被证明是简单安全的技术。
