Abstract：
This scoping review was conducted to systematically search and chronicle scientific literature pertinent to poultry intake and human health. The protocol (uploaded to Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/2k7bj/) was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Articles with observational and experimental research, narrative and systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included. Among 13,141 articles identified, 525 met inclusion criteria. Among these 525 articles, 212 focused on cancer morbidity and mortality; 41 on cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality; 52 on CVD risk factors; 32 on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) morbidity and mortality; 33 on T2DM risk factors; and 42 on body weight and body composition. An \"Other\" category (181 articles) included nutrient status, psychological well-being/mental health, cognition, microbiome, chronic kidney disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, skin disorders, and fertility, among others. Among the 525 included articles, 366 were observational, 64 were experimental, and 76 were reviews and meta-analyses. Eighty-three percent of articles focused on adults or older adults. A paucity of research exists to support poultry as health-promoting foods, with most research only indirectly assessing poultry intake compared with other foods of interest (e.g., red meats or plant-based protein foods). No randomized controlled trials and only 1% of OBS assessed the influence of processed poultry intake on human health. In the future, the relative health effects of consuming poultry will be compared with a widening array of traditional and new protein-rich food products, necessitating the need for research to assess poultry as foods of choice. Science and health professionals, the poultry industry, and the public will benefit from new observational and experimental research to address cutting-edge scientific, public policy, and consumer topics pertinent to poultry intake and human health.
摘要：
进行此范围审查是为了系统地搜索和记录与家禽摄入量和人类健康有关的科学文献。协议(上传到开放科学框架，https://osf.io/2k7bj/)是根据系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查指南的荟萃分析扩展进行的。具有观察和实验研究的文章，叙事和系统评论，并纳入荟萃分析。在确定的13141篇文章中，525符合纳入标准。在这525篇文章中，212关注癌症发病率和死亡率；41关注心血管疾病（CVD）发病率和死亡率；52关注CVD危险因素；32关注2型糖尿病（T2DM）发病率和死亡率；33关注T2DM危险因素；42关注体重和身体组成。一个“其他”类别(181篇文章)包括营养状况，心理健康/心理健康，认知，微生物组,慢性肾病,非酒精性脂肪性肝病,皮肤病,和生育能力，在其他人中。在纳入的525篇文章中，366是观察性的，64个是实验性的，76人是综述和荟萃分析.83％的文章集中在成年人或老年人身上。缺乏支持家禽作为健康促进食品的研究，与大多数研究仅间接评估与其他感兴趣的食物相比的家禽摄入量(例如，红肉或植物性蛋白质食品）。没有随机对照试验，只有1％的OBS评估了加工家禽摄入量对人类健康的影响。在未来,食用家禽的相对健康影响将与越来越多的传统和新的富含蛋白质的食品进行比较，有必要进行研究以评估家禽作为首选食品。科学和卫生专业人员，家禽业,公众将受益于新的观测和实验研究，以解决尖端科学，公共政策,以及与家禽摄入量和人类健康有关的消费者主题。
