Abstract：
This scoping review aims to examine the extent and the manner in which research that utilizes successful, active, productive, and healthy aging framework(s) includes death or dying.
An examination of peer-reviewed academic journal articles was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute\'s methodological standards for scoping reviews and conforming to Arskey and O\'Malley\'s 5-stage framework. The initial search resulted in 1,759 articles for review, and following the rigorous screening, 35 studies were included for the final review. A qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify how research utilizes the concepts of death and dying in the context of 4 positive aging models.
The core themes identified include (a) the absence of death and dying dimensions in positive aging models; (b) older adults\' outlooks on death and dying while aging well; (c) religious and spiritual dimensions of aging well; (d) negative consequences of positive aging models without death and dying dimensions; and (e) the future of death and dying in positive aging models.
The review delivers a critique by researchers on the noticeable absence of death and dying processes within the framework of successful, active, productive, and healthy aging models. These findings represent a rich opportunity for future research on these concepts.
An examination of peer-reviewed academic journal articles was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute\'s methodological standards for scoping reviews and conforming to Arskey and O\'Malley\'s 5-stage framework. The initial search resulted in 1,759 articles for review, and following the rigorous screening, 35 studies were included for the final review. A qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify how research utilizes the concepts of death and dying in the context of 4 positive aging models.
The core themes identified include (a) the absence of death and dying dimensions in positive aging models; (b) older adults\' outlooks on death and dying while aging well; (c) religious and spiritual dimensions of aging well; (d) negative consequences of positive aging models without death and dying dimensions; and (e) the future of death and dying in positive aging models.
The review delivers a critique by researchers on the noticeable absence of death and dying processes within the framework of successful, active, productive, and healthy aging models. These findings represent a rich opportunity for future research on these concepts.
摘要：
目的：本范围审查旨在检查利用成功的研究的程度和方式，活跃,生产,健康的衰老框架包括死亡或死亡。
方法：根据JoannaBriggsInstitute的范围审查方法学标准，对同行评审的学术期刊文章进行了审查，并符合Arskey和O'Malley的五阶段框架。最初的搜索结果是1,759篇文章供审查，经过严格的筛选，最终审查包括35项研究。定性主题分析用于确定研究如何在四个积极衰老模型的背景下利用死亡和死亡的概念。
结果：确定的核心主题包括：（a）积极衰老模型中没有死亡和死亡维度；（b）老年人在衰老良好时对死亡和死亡的看法；（c）衰老的宗教和精神维度；（d）没有死亡和死亡维度的积极衰老模型的负面影响；（e）积极衰老模型中死亡和死亡的未来。
结论：该评论对研究人员在成功的框架内明显缺乏死亡和死亡过程提出了批评。活跃,生产,和健康的衰老模型。这些发现为未来研究这些概念提供了丰富的机会。
方法：根据JoannaBriggsInstitute的范围审查方法学标准，对同行评审的学术期刊文章进行了审查，并符合Arskey和O'Malley的五阶段框架。最初的搜索结果是1,759篇文章供审查，经过严格的筛选，最终审查包括35项研究。定性主题分析用于确定研究如何在四个积极衰老模型的背景下利用死亡和死亡的概念。
结果：确定的核心主题包括：（a）积极衰老模型中没有死亡和死亡维度；（b）老年人在衰老良好时对死亡和死亡的看法；（c）衰老的宗教和精神维度；（d）没有死亡和死亡维度的积极衰老模型的负面影响；（e）积极衰老模型中死亡和死亡的未来。
结论：该评论对研究人员在成功的框架内明显缺乏死亡和死亡过程提出了批评。活跃,生产,和健康的衰老模型。这些发现为未来研究这些概念提供了丰富的机会。
