METHODS: A total of 150 patients diagnosed with UTIs were enrolled, and their laboratory findings were analyzed, focusing on the discrepancy in bacterial numbers between UF-1000i and conventional culture at each antimicrobial therapy effectiveness classification. In addition, gene identification was conducted by molecular analysis using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to elucidate the reason for the presence of fastidious bacteria in these samples.
RESULTS: The ineffective therapy cases showed more than 100-fold discrepancy in bacterial counts, with a higher proportion (30.8%) than effective therapy cases without secondary administration (5.7%) between the bacterial counts in UF-1000i and conventional culture methods. The presence rates of fastidious bacteria were 100% and 66.7% in discrepant cases of ineffective and effective without secondary administrations, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that discrepancies in bacterial numbers between the conventional culture method and UF-1000i measurement at the primary visit can predict the presence of fastidious bacteria, especially in cases of ineffective antimicrobial therapy.
方法:共纳入150例诊断为尿路感染的患者,并分析了他们的实验室发现,重点关注UF-1000i和条件培养在每个抗菌治疗有效性分类之间的细菌数量差异。此外,通过使用16S核糖体RNA基因测序和下一代测序(NGS)的分子分析进行基因鉴定,以阐明这些样品中存在挑剔细菌的原因.
结果:治疗无效的病例显示细菌计数差异超过100倍,UF-1000i和常规培养方法的细菌计数之间的比例(30.8%)高于没有二次给药的有效治疗病例(5.7%)。在无效和无二次给药有效的不同病例中,挑剔细菌的存在率分别为100%和66.7%,分别。
结论:这项研究表明,常规培养方法与初次就诊时UF-1000i测量之间的细菌数量差异可以预测细菌的存在,尤其是在抗菌治疗无效的情况下。