PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of gelatamp on soft tissue healing, bleeding, and pain following mandibular posterior teeth extraction.
UNASSIGNED: This study was designed as a split-mouth, prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial conducted in a single tertiary care center. Thirty-five subjects indicated for routine mandibular posterior teeth extraction were divided into two groups using the lottery technique: the experimental group (n = 30), which received gelatamp after extraction, and the control group (n = 30), which received no intervention. The primary outcomes included soft tissue healing(Landry, Turnbull, Howley index) and Pain(VAS score). The secondary outcomes assessed were bleeding(Maani et al. index) and swelling(Sauza and Consone assessment).
UNASSIGNED: The results showed a statistically significant difference in soft tissue healing on the third and seventh days in the experimental group (p ≤ 0.05) than in the control group. A significant difference in bleeding scores at 5 min, 30 min, and 2 h postoperatively in the study group (p ≤ 0.05) was noted. There was no significant difference between the groups for pain on the first, third or seventh day postoperatively (p ≤ 0.05). The swelling assessment also showed no significant changes (p = 0.831) for the study and the control group.
UNASSIGNED: Based on the findings of this study, gelatamp can be effectively used to reduce postoperative sequelae such as bleeding with better soft tissue healing following extractions and surgical removal of tooth.
UNASSIGNED: This study was designed as a split-mouth, prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial conducted in a single tertiary care center. Thirty-five subjects indicated for routine mandibular posterior teeth extraction were divided into two groups using the lottery technique: the experimental group (n = 30), which received gelatamp after extraction, and the control group (n = 30), which received no intervention. The primary outcomes included soft tissue healing(Landry, Turnbull, Howley index) and Pain(VAS score). The secondary outcomes assessed were bleeding(Maani et al. index) and swelling(Sauza and Consone assessment).
UNASSIGNED: The results showed a statistically significant difference in soft tissue healing on the third and seventh days in the experimental group (p ≤ 0.05) than in the control group. A significant difference in bleeding scores at 5 min, 30 min, and 2 h postoperatively in the study group (p ≤ 0.05) was noted. There was no significant difference between the groups for pain on the first, third or seventh day postoperatively (p ≤ 0.05). The swelling assessment also showed no significant changes (p = 0.831) for the study and the control group.
UNASSIGNED: Based on the findings of this study, gelatamp can be effectively used to reduce postoperative sequelae such as bleeding with better soft tissue healing following extractions and surgical removal of tooth.
摘要：
未经评估：本研究旨在评估gelatamp对软组织愈合的有效性，出血,下颌后牙拔除后疼痛。
未经评估：本研究设计为裂口，前瞻性随机双盲对照试验在一个三级护理中心进行.采用抽签技术将35例接受常规下颌后牙拔除的受试者分为两组：实验组（n=30），提取后收到明胶，对照组（n=30），没有得到任何干预。主要结果包括软组织愈合(Landry，特恩布尔,Howley指数）和疼痛（VAS评分）。评估的次要结果是出血（Maani等人。指数)和肿胀(Sauza和Consone评估)。
UNASSIGNED：结果显示实验组第3天和第7天的软组织愈合与对照组相比差异有统计学意义（p≤0.05）。5分钟时出血评分有显著差异，30分钟,研究组术后2h（p≤0.05）。第一组疼痛之间没有显着差异，术后第3天或第7天（p≤0.05）。肿胀评估也显示研究组和对照组没有显著变化(p=0.831)。
未经评估：根据本研究的结果，gelatamp可以有效地减少术后后遗症，如出血，更好的软组织愈合后拔牙和手术拔牙。
未经评估：本研究设计为裂口，前瞻性随机双盲对照试验在一个三级护理中心进行.采用抽签技术将35例接受常规下颌后牙拔除的受试者分为两组：实验组（n=30），提取后收到明胶，对照组（n=30），没有得到任何干预。主要结果包括软组织愈合(Landry，特恩布尔,Howley指数）和疼痛（VAS评分）。评估的次要结果是出血（Maani等人。指数)和肿胀(Sauza和Consone评估)。
UNASSIGNED：结果显示实验组第3天和第7天的软组织愈合与对照组相比差异有统计学意义（p≤0.05）。5分钟时出血评分有显著差异，30分钟,研究组术后2h（p≤0.05）。第一组疼痛之间没有显着差异，术后第3天或第7天（p≤0.05）。肿胀评估也显示研究组和对照组没有显著变化(p=0.831)。
未经评估：根据本研究的结果，gelatamp可以有效地减少术后后遗症，如出血，更好的软组织愈合后拔牙和手术拔牙。
