PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Health literacy (HL) has shown its important role on reducing the burden of heart diseases. However, no study has provided a comprehensive worldwide view of the data regarding HL and heart diseases. The study aimed to provide insight into: (1) the intellectual structure, (2) research trends, and (3) research gaps on HL and heart diseases; and (4) to explore HL scales commonly utilized in heart studies.
UNASSIGNED: Studies related to HL and heart diseases were retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. All publications published between 2000 and 2021 were included after conducting keyword searches on \"heart diseases\" in general or on specific types of heart diseases (e.g., \"heart failure\") and \"health literacy\". Bibliometric analyses were carried out using the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer 1.6.14.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 388 original research articles and reviews on HL and heart diseases were included in our study. The studies were primarily conducted in the United States and developed countries. A total of 337 studies (86.9%) focused on heart failure (200 studies, 51.5%) and ischemic heart diseases (137 studies, 35.3%). Sixty-two studies (16.0%) focused on other heart diseases (e.g., valvular diseases and rheumatic heart diseases). The number of interventional studies was limited (52 studies, 13.4%) and fluctuated from 2000 to 2021. The most common questionnaires measuring health literacy among patients with heart diseases were the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (STOFHLA), and Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS). Use of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) has become the latest trend among patients with heart diseases.
UNASSIGNED: Health literacy and heart diseases were most often studied in the United States and developed countries. Several HL tools were used; eHEALS has been lately used in this field. These findings suggest the need to conduct more empirical studies on HL and heart diseases in different settings (e.g., developing or poor countries) and with different types of heart diseases (e.g., valvular and rheumatic disorders). Additionally, it is necessary to develop heart disease-specified HL scales for research and practice.
UNASSIGNED: Studies related to HL and heart diseases were retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. All publications published between 2000 and 2021 were included after conducting keyword searches on \"heart diseases\" in general or on specific types of heart diseases (e.g., \"heart failure\") and \"health literacy\". Bibliometric analyses were carried out using the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer 1.6.14.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 388 original research articles and reviews on HL and heart diseases were included in our study. The studies were primarily conducted in the United States and developed countries. A total of 337 studies (86.9%) focused on heart failure (200 studies, 51.5%) and ischemic heart diseases (137 studies, 35.3%). Sixty-two studies (16.0%) focused on other heart diseases (e.g., valvular diseases and rheumatic heart diseases). The number of interventional studies was limited (52 studies, 13.4%) and fluctuated from 2000 to 2021. The most common questionnaires measuring health literacy among patients with heart diseases were the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (STOFHLA), and Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS). Use of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) has become the latest trend among patients with heart diseases.
UNASSIGNED: Health literacy and heart diseases were most often studied in the United States and developed countries. Several HL tools were used; eHEALS has been lately used in this field. These findings suggest the need to conduct more empirical studies on HL and heart diseases in different settings (e.g., developing or poor countries) and with different types of heart diseases (e.g., valvular and rheumatic disorders). Additionally, it is necessary to develop heart disease-specified HL scales for research and practice.
摘要：
UNASSIGNED：健康素养（HL）已显示出其在减轻心脏病负担方面的重要作用。然而,没有一项研究对HL和心脏疾病的数据提供了全面的全球观点.这项研究旨在提供以下方面的见解：(1)智力结构，(2)研究趋势,（3）HL和心脏病的研究空白；（4）探索心脏研究中常用的HL量表。
未经评估：从WebofScience检索到与HL和心脏病相关的研究，Scopus,和PubMed。在对一般的“心脏病”或特定类型的心脏病进行关键字搜索后，纳入了2000年至2021年之间发布的所有出版物（例如，\"心力衰竭\")和\"健康素养\"。使用BibliometrixR软件包和VOSviewer1.6.14进行文献计量分析。
UNASSIGNED：我们的研究共纳入了388篇关于HL和心脏病的原始研究文章和综述。这些研究主要在美国和发达国家进行。共有337项研究(86.9%)关注心力衰竭(200项研究,51.5%）和缺血性心脏病（137项研究，35.3%）。62项研究（16.0%）集中于其他心脏病（例如，瓣膜疾病和风湿性心脏病）。介入研究的数量有限(52项研究，13.4%），从2000年到2021年波动。测量心脏病患者健康素养的最常见问卷是成人功能健康素养测试（TOFHLA），成人功能健康素养简短测试（STOFHLA），和简短的健康素养屏幕（BHLS）。使用电子健康素养量表（eHEALS）已成为心脏病患者的最新趋势。
UNASSIGNED：在美国和发达国家最常研究健康素养和心脏病。使用了几种HL工具；eHEALS最近已在该领域中使用。这些发现表明，需要在不同的环境中对HL和心脏病进行更多的实证研究(例如，发展中国家或贫穷国家)和患有不同类型的心脏病(例如，瓣膜和风湿性疾病）。此外,有必要开发针对心脏病的HL量表进行研究和实践。
未经评估：从WebofScience检索到与HL和心脏病相关的研究，Scopus,和PubMed。在对一般的“心脏病”或特定类型的心脏病进行关键字搜索后，纳入了2000年至2021年之间发布的所有出版物（例如，\"心力衰竭\")和\"健康素养\"。使用BibliometrixR软件包和VOSviewer1.6.14进行文献计量分析。
UNASSIGNED：我们的研究共纳入了388篇关于HL和心脏病的原始研究文章和综述。这些研究主要在美国和发达国家进行。共有337项研究(86.9%)关注心力衰竭(200项研究,51.5%）和缺血性心脏病（137项研究，35.3%）。62项研究（16.0%）集中于其他心脏病（例如，瓣膜疾病和风湿性心脏病）。介入研究的数量有限(52项研究，13.4%），从2000年到2021年波动。测量心脏病患者健康素养的最常见问卷是成人功能健康素养测试（TOFHLA），成人功能健康素养简短测试（STOFHLA），和简短的健康素养屏幕（BHLS）。使用电子健康素养量表（eHEALS）已成为心脏病患者的最新趋势。
UNASSIGNED：在美国和发达国家最常研究健康素养和心脏病。使用了几种HL工具；eHEALS最近已在该领域中使用。这些发现表明，需要在不同的环境中对HL和心脏病进行更多的实证研究(例如，发展中国家或贫穷国家)和患有不同类型的心脏病(例如，瓣膜和风湿性疾病）。此外,有必要开发针对心脏病的HL量表进行研究和实践。
