UNASSIGNED: A randomized case-control clinical study was carried out from September 2017 to September 2019. In this study, a total number of 50 patients with mandibular third molar impaction underwent surgical removal of the same using buccal envelope flap (group A) and pedicle flap (group B). The patients were assessed postoperatively for pain, swelling, trismus, wound dehiscence, dry socket, and quality of life for one month.
UNASSIGNED: In terms of pain, swelling, and trismus, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference found in group B (pedicle flap) in terms of wound dehiscence, dry socket, and quality of life (p < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: The pedicle flap demonstrates fewer incidences of wound dehiscence, dry socket, and a better quality of life when compared to the envelope flap.
UNASSIGNED:2017年9月至2019年9月进行了随机病例对照临床研究。在这项研究中,总共50例下颌第三磨牙嵌塞患者接受了使用颊膜瓣(A组)和蒂皮瓣(B组)的手术切除。术后对患者进行疼痛评估,肿胀,刺耳,伤口裂开,干燥插座,一个月的生活质量。
未经评估:在疼痛方面,肿胀,和刺耳,两组间无统计学差异(p>0.05)。然而,B组(带蒂皮瓣)在伤口裂开方面有统计学意义的差异,干燥插座,和生活质量(p<0.05)。
未经证实:蒂皮瓣显示伤口裂开的发生率较低,干燥插座,与信封皮瓣相比,生活质量更好。