A two-round modified Delphi technique was used to explore consensus on 14 patient cases for hospitalised children with a high PTTT score that did not raise concerns by systematically collating questionnaire responses. Participants rated their level of agreement on a 9-point Likert scale. IQR and median were calculated for each case.
A total of 221 participants completed round 1 and 101 participants completed round 2. Across the two rounds, majority of the participants were from paediatric departments, nurses and women. In round 1, consensus on inclusion was reached on 2 of the 14 cases. In round 2, consensus was reached on one additional patient case. Three of the 11 non-consensus cases remaining after rounds 1 and 2 were included by the research group based on predefined criteria.
In conclusion, a consensus opinion was achieved on six patient cases where the child had a high PTTT score but where the healthcare professionals were not as concerned as indicated by the PTTT score.
使用两轮改良的Delphi技术,对14例PTTT得分较高的住院儿童患者进行共识,通过系统地整理问卷的回答,这些患者没有引起关注。参与者以9分的李克特量表对他们的协议水平进行了评分。计算每种情况的IQR和中位数。
共有221名参与者完成了第1轮,101名参与者完成了第2轮。在两轮中,大多数参与者来自儿科,护士和妇女。在第一轮中,就14个案件中的2个达成了关于纳入的共识。在第2轮中,就另一例患者病例达成共识。研究小组根据预定义的标准纳入了第1轮和第2轮之后剩余的11例非共识病例中的3例。
总之,对6例患儿的PTTT评分较高,但医疗保健专业人员的关注程度不如PTTT评分所显示的那样,达成了共识意见.