PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Cardiothoracic (CT) surgeons with National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 funding face a highly competitive renewal process. The factors that contribute to successful grant renewal for CT surgeons remain poorly defined. We hypothesized that renewed basic science grants are associated with high research output and scholarly impact during the preceding award cycle.
UNASSIGNED: Using a database of academic CT surgeons (n = 992) at accredited training institutions in 2018, we identified basic science R01 grants awarded to CT surgeon principal investigators since 1985. Data for each award were obtained from publicly available online sources. Scholarly impact was evaluated using the NIH-validated relative citation ratio (RCR), defined as an article\'s citation rate divided by that of R01-funded publications in the same field. Continuous data are presented as medians and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 102 basic science R01 award cycles, including 33 that were renewed (32.4%). Renewed and nonrenewed awards had a similar start year and funding period. Principal investigators of renewed versus nonrenewed awards were similar in surgical subspecialty, research training, attending experience, academic rank, and previous NIH funding. Renewed awards produced more publications per year over the funding cycle (3.4 vs 1.5; P = .0010) and exhibited a greater median RCR during the funding cycle (0.84 vs 0.66; P = .0183).
UNASSIGNED: CT surgery basic science R01 grants are associated with high research output and scholarly impact. At the 50th percentile among renewed grants, CT surgeons published 3.4 funded manuscripts per year with a median RCR of 0.84 during the previous award cycle.
UNASSIGNED: Using a database of academic CT surgeons (n = 992) at accredited training institutions in 2018, we identified basic science R01 grants awarded to CT surgeon principal investigators since 1985. Data for each award were obtained from publicly available online sources. Scholarly impact was evaluated using the NIH-validated relative citation ratio (RCR), defined as an article\'s citation rate divided by that of R01-funded publications in the same field. Continuous data are presented as medians and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 102 basic science R01 award cycles, including 33 that were renewed (32.4%). Renewed and nonrenewed awards had a similar start year and funding period. Principal investigators of renewed versus nonrenewed awards were similar in surgical subspecialty, research training, attending experience, academic rank, and previous NIH funding. Renewed awards produced more publications per year over the funding cycle (3.4 vs 1.5; P = .0010) and exhibited a greater median RCR during the funding cycle (0.84 vs 0.66; P = .0183).
UNASSIGNED: CT surgery basic science R01 grants are associated with high research output and scholarly impact. At the 50th percentile among renewed grants, CT surgeons published 3.4 funded manuscripts per year with a median RCR of 0.84 during the previous award cycle.
摘要：
未经批准：由美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）R01资助的心胸（CT）外科医生面临着竞争激烈的更新过程。有助于CT外科医生成功续签的因素仍然不明确。我们假设，在上一个奖励周期中，新的基础科学资助与高研究成果和学术影响力有关。
UNASSIGNED：使用2018年认可培训机构的学术CT外科医生数据库（n=992），我们确定了自1985年以来授予CT外科医生主要研究者的基础科学R01赠款。每个奖项的数据来自公开的在线来源。使用NIH验证的相对引文比(RCR)评估学术影响，定义为文章的引用率除以同一领域R01资助出版物的引用率。连续数据以中位数表示，并使用Mann-Whitney检验进行分析。
未经评估：我们确定了102个基础科学R01奖励周期，包括续签的33个(32.4%)。续签和未续签的奖项的开始年和资助期相似。在外科亚专科中，更新的奖励与非更新的奖励的主要研究者相似，研究培训,出席体验,学术排名，和以前的NIH资助。在筹资周期内，续发的奖项每年产生更多的出版物（3.4vs1.5；P=.0010），在筹资周期内显示出更大的RCR中位数（0.84vs0.66；P=.0183）。
UNASSIGNED：CT外科基础科学R01拨款与高研究成果和学术影响力相关。在更新的赠款中，第50百分位数，CT外科医生每年发表3.4份资助的手稿，在上一个奖励周期中，平均RCR为0.84。
UNASSIGNED：使用2018年认可培训机构的学术CT外科医生数据库（n=992），我们确定了自1985年以来授予CT外科医生主要研究者的基础科学R01赠款。每个奖项的数据来自公开的在线来源。使用NIH验证的相对引文比(RCR)评估学术影响，定义为文章的引用率除以同一领域R01资助出版物的引用率。连续数据以中位数表示，并使用Mann-Whitney检验进行分析。
未经评估：我们确定了102个基础科学R01奖励周期，包括续签的33个(32.4%)。续签和未续签的奖项的开始年和资助期相似。在外科亚专科中，更新的奖励与非更新的奖励的主要研究者相似，研究培训,出席体验,学术排名，和以前的NIH资助。在筹资周期内，续发的奖项每年产生更多的出版物（3.4vs1.5；P=.0010），在筹资周期内显示出更大的RCR中位数（0.84vs0.66；P=.0183）。
UNASSIGNED：CT外科基础科学R01拨款与高研究成果和学术影响力相关。在更新的赠款中，第50百分位数，CT外科医生每年发表3.4份资助的手稿，在上一个奖励周期中，平均RCR为0.84。
