PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
When there is no immediate response after a proposal and normally the silence is longer than 0.2 s, the proposer would take subsequent actions to pursue a preferred response or mobilize at least an articulated one from the recipient. These actions modulate the prior deontic stance embedded in the original proposal into four trends as follows: (1) maintaining the prior deontic stance with a self-repair or by seeking confirmation; (2) making the prior deontic stance more tentative by making a revised other-attentiveness proposal, providing an account, pursuing with a tag question, or requesting with an intimate address term; (3) making the prior deontic stance more decisive by making a further arrangement (for the original proposal), closing the local sequence, or providing a candidate unwillingness account (for the recipient\'s potential rejection); and (4) canceling the prior deontic stance by doing a counter-like action. Additionally, these trends inherently embody a decisive-to-tentative gradient. This study would penetrate into the phenomena occurring in Mandarin mundane talk with the methodology of Conversation Analysis to uncover the underflow of deontic stance.
摘要：
当提案后没有立即响应，并且通常沉默超过0.2s时，提案人将采取后续行动，寻求首选的回应，或动员接受者至少明确表达的回应。这些行动将原始提案中嵌入的先前的道义立场调整为以下四个趋势：（1）通过自我修复或寻求确认来维持先前的道义立场；（2）通过修改后的其他注意力提案使先前的道义立场更具试探性，提供一个帐户，追求一个标签问题，或以亲密的地址提出要求；（3）通过进一步安排（对于原始提案），使先前的执事立场更具决定性，关闭本地序列，或提供候选人不愿意的帐户（对于接收者的潜在拒绝）；（4）通过采取类似的反行动来取消先前的执事立场。此外,这些趋势固有地体现了决定性到暂定的梯度。这项研究将通过对话分析的方法渗透到普通话平凡的谈话中发生的现象中，以揭示道教立场的根源。
