PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
Food safety risk management is an important cross-boundary issue from both theoretical and practical standpoints. Because food safety has the social attributes of public goods, public-public collaboration can be considered a particularly important mode of cross-boundary governance. The study aims to provide a theoretical basis for the Chinese government to promote public-public collaboration for food safety risk management by identifying key factors.
Based on a review of literature across diverse fields, such as political science, sociology, and new public governance, this study discusses the essence, modes, and dilemma of public-public collaboration for food safety risk management using practical explorations in various countries as the main thread and taking into account the actual situation in China. Moreover, this study quantitatively analyzes the relationships between the dimensions and factors affecting public-public collaboration and identifies key dimensions and factors using the Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-based Analytic Network Process (DANP).
Among the 20 factors in the calculation results of DANP, Lawmaking has the highest value of (f i +e i ) (7.022) and ranks sixth in terms of influence weight. The (f i +e i )value of Professionalism (6.993) ranks second and its influence weight ranks fourth. The (f i +e i ) value of Administrative enforcement (6.722) ranks fifth, and its influence weight ranks seventh. The (f i +e i ) value of Improvement of the social environment (6.699) ranks sixth, and its influence weight ranks fifth. The (f i +e i ) value of Legal authorization (6.614) ranks seventh, and its influence weight ranks tenth. Data analysis indicated that these are the five key factors affecting the governance capacity in public-public collaboration for food safety risk management.
The legal basis is the most important dimension affecting public-public collaboration. Legislation-based governance, administrative law enforcement-based governance, and social environment improvement-based governance in the behavior and capabilities dimension, professionalism in the basic characteristics dimension, and laws and regulations in the legal basis dimension are the five key factors.
Based on a review of literature across diverse fields, such as political science, sociology, and new public governance, this study discusses the essence, modes, and dilemma of public-public collaboration for food safety risk management using practical explorations in various countries as the main thread and taking into account the actual situation in China. Moreover, this study quantitatively analyzes the relationships between the dimensions and factors affecting public-public collaboration and identifies key dimensions and factors using the Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-based Analytic Network Process (DANP).
Among the 20 factors in the calculation results of DANP, Lawmaking has the highest value of (f i +e i ) (7.022) and ranks sixth in terms of influence weight. The (f i +e i )value of Professionalism (6.993) ranks second and its influence weight ranks fourth. The (f i +e i ) value of Administrative enforcement (6.722) ranks fifth, and its influence weight ranks seventh. The (f i +e i ) value of Improvement of the social environment (6.699) ranks sixth, and its influence weight ranks fifth. The (f i +e i ) value of Legal authorization (6.614) ranks seventh, and its influence weight ranks tenth. Data analysis indicated that these are the five key factors affecting the governance capacity in public-public collaboration for food safety risk management.
The legal basis is the most important dimension affecting public-public collaboration. Legislation-based governance, administrative law enforcement-based governance, and social environment improvement-based governance in the behavior and capabilities dimension, professionalism in the basic characteristics dimension, and laws and regulations in the legal basis dimension are the five key factors.
摘要：
从理论和实践的角度来看，食品安全风险管理是一个重要的跨界问题。因为食品安全具有公共物品的社会属性,公共-公共合作可以被认为是一种特别重要的跨境治理模式。本研究旨在通过识别关键因素，为中国政府促进食品安全风险管理的公共-公共合作提供理论依据。
基于对不同领域文献的回顾，比如政治学,社会学,和新的公共治理，这项研究讨论了本质，模式,以各国的实践探索为主线，结合我国的实际情况，构建公共-公共合作的食品安全风险管理困境。此外，这项研究定量分析了影响公共-公共合作的维度和因素之间的关系，并使用基于决策试验和评估实验室的分析网络过程（DANP）确定关键维度和因素。
在DANP计算结果的20个因素中，法律制定的值最高为(fi+ei)(7.022)，影响力权重排名第六。专业(6.993)的(fi+ei)值排在第二位，其影响权重排在第四位。行政强制执行的(fi+ei)值(6.722)排名第五，其影响力排名第七。社会环境改善的(fi+ei)值(6.699)排名第六，其影响力排名第五。法律授权的(fi+ei)值(6.614)排名第七，其影响力排名第十。数据分析表明，这些是影响食品安全风险管理公共-公共合作治理能力的五个关键因素。
法律基础是影响公共-公共合作的最重要维度。以立法为基础的治理，行政执法治理,以及基于社会环境改善的行为和能力维度的治理，专业性在基本特征维度上，法律基础维度的法律法规是五个关键因素。
基于对不同领域文献的回顾，比如政治学,社会学,和新的公共治理，这项研究讨论了本质，模式,以各国的实践探索为主线，结合我国的实际情况，构建公共-公共合作的食品安全风险管理困境。此外，这项研究定量分析了影响公共-公共合作的维度和因素之间的关系，并使用基于决策试验和评估实验室的分析网络过程（DANP）确定关键维度和因素。
在DANP计算结果的20个因素中，法律制定的值最高为(fi+ei)(7.022)，影响力权重排名第六。专业(6.993)的(fi+ei)值排在第二位，其影响权重排在第四位。行政强制执行的(fi+ei)值(6.722)排名第五，其影响力排名第七。社会环境改善的(fi+ei)值(6.699)排名第六，其影响力排名第五。法律授权的(fi+ei)值(6.614)排名第七，其影响力排名第十。数据分析表明，这些是影响食品安全风险管理公共-公共合作治理能力的五个关键因素。
法律基础是影响公共-公共合作的最重要维度。以立法为基础的治理，行政执法治理,以及基于社会环境改善的行为和能力维度的治理，专业性在基本特征维度上，法律基础维度的法律法规是五个关键因素。
