A retrospective cohort study from 25 cancer centers in Australia, Europe, USA and Asia was carried out. Patients with histologically confirmed MM were treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) ± ipilimumab. Primary endpoints were response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) by primary site (naso-oral, urogenital, anorectal, other), ethnicity/race (Caucasian, Asian, Other) and treatment. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses were conducted.
In total, 545 patients were included: 331 (63%) Caucasian, 176 (33%) Asian and 20 (4%) Other. Primary sites included 113 (21%) anorectal, 178 (32%) urogenital, 206 (38%) naso-oral and 45 (8%) other. Three hundred and forty-eight (64%) patients received anti-PD-1 and 197 (36%) anti-PD-1/ipilimumab. RR, PFS and OS did not differ by primary site, ethnicity/race or treatment. RR for naso-oral was numerically higher for anti-PD-1/ipilimumab [40%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 29% to 54%] compared with anti-PD-1 (29%, 95% CI 21% to 37%). Thirty-five percent of patients who initially responded progressed. The median duration of response (mDoR) was 26 months (95% CI 18 months-not reached). Factors associated with short PFS were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥3 (P < 0.01), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) more than the upper limit of normal (ULN) (P = 0.01), lung metastases (P < 0.01) and ≥1 previous treatments (P < 0.01). Factors associated with short OS were ECOG PS ≥1 (P < 0.01), LDH >ULN (P = 0.03), lung metastases (P < 0.01) and ≥1 previous treatments (P < 0.01).
MM has poor prognosis. Treatment efficacy of anti-PD-1 ± ipilimumab was similar and did not differ by ethnicity/race. Naso-oral primaries had numerically higher response to anti-PD-1/ipilimumab, without difference in survival. The addition of ipilimumab did not show greater benefit over anti-PD-1 for other primary sites. In responders, mDoR was short and acquired resistance was common. Other factors, including site and number of metastases, were associated with survival.
一项来自澳大利亚25个癌症中心的回顾性队列研究,欧洲,在美国和亚洲进行。组织学证实的MM患者接受抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)±ipilimumab治疗。主要终点是反应率(RR),无进展生存期(PFS),按主要部位划分的总生存期(OS)(鼻口,泌尿生殖系统,肛门直肠,其他),种族/种族(高加索人,亚洲人,其他)和治疗。进行单因素和多因素Cox比例风险模型分析。
总共,545例患者包括:331(63%)白种人,176(33%)亚洲和20(4%)其他。主要部位包括113(21%)肛门直肠,178(32%)泌尿生殖系统,206(38%)鼻口和45(8%)其他。三百四十八名(64%)患者接受了抗PD-1和197名(36%)抗PD-1/ipilimumab。RR,PFS和OS没有因主站点而异,种族/种族或待遇。经鼻口服的RR在数值上高于抗PD-1/ipilimumab[40%,95%置信区间(CI)29%至54%]与抗PD-1(29%,95%CI21%至37%)。最初有反应的患者中有35%进展。中位缓解持续时间(mDoR)为26个月(95%CI18个月-未达到)。与短PFS相关的因素是东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)表现状态(PS)≥3(P<0.01),乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)高于正常上限(ULN)(P=0.01),肺转移(P<0.01)和≥1次治疗(P<0.01)。与短OS相关的因素为ECOGPS≥1(P<0.01),LDH>ULN(P=0.03),肺转移(P<0.01)和≥1次治疗(P<0.01)。
MM预后不良。抗PD-1±ipilimumab的治疗效果相似,种族/种族没有差异。鼻-口初级对抗PD-1/ipilimumab有更高的反应,没有生存差异。对于其他主要位点,添加ipilimumab并未显示出比抗PD-1更大的益处。在响应者中,mDoR短,获得性抗性普遍。其他因素,包括转移的部位和数量,与生存有关。