PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
Maintaining the subjective wellbeing of the elderly people is one of the major concerns in promoting health aging. This study concerned the influence of multi-level social capital on subjective welling and explored the affecting path among the elderly.
A total of 1,078 elderly individuals anonymously and effectively surveyed in 2018, data was collected including their family, workplace, community, society social capital and subjective wellbeing, we used the structural equation modeling to test the hypothesis relationships among the variables.
We found that the total score of subjective wellbeing among the aging participants was 72.36 ± 10.08 on a range of 0-100. Family (β = 0.151, P < 0.001), workplace (β = 0.090, P < 0.001), community (β = 0.163, P < 0.001) social capital had a direct positive effect on subjective wellbeing. Society social capital had a direct positive effect on family (β = 0.253, P < 0.001), workplace (β = 0.585, P < 0.001), community (β = 0.438, P < 0.001) social capital. And society social capital had an indirect positive effect on subjective wellbeing through the mediating role of family, workplace, and community social capital.
The research demonstrated that all the micro, meso and macro levels of social capital have protective effects for subjective wellbeing through direct or indirect way, inspiring to provide continuous improvement measures for multi-level social capital aimed at the elderly people.
A total of 1,078 elderly individuals anonymously and effectively surveyed in 2018, data was collected including their family, workplace, community, society social capital and subjective wellbeing, we used the structural equation modeling to test the hypothesis relationships among the variables.
We found that the total score of subjective wellbeing among the aging participants was 72.36 ± 10.08 on a range of 0-100. Family (β = 0.151, P < 0.001), workplace (β = 0.090, P < 0.001), community (β = 0.163, P < 0.001) social capital had a direct positive effect on subjective wellbeing. Society social capital had a direct positive effect on family (β = 0.253, P < 0.001), workplace (β = 0.585, P < 0.001), community (β = 0.438, P < 0.001) social capital. And society social capital had an indirect positive effect on subjective wellbeing through the mediating role of family, workplace, and community social capital.
The research demonstrated that all the micro, meso and macro levels of social capital have protective effects for subjective wellbeing through direct or indirect way, inspiring to provide continuous improvement measures for multi-level social capital aimed at the elderly people.
摘要：
保持老年人的主观幸福感是促进健康老龄化的主要问题之一。本研究关注多层次社会资本对老年人主观生活的影响，并探讨其影响路径。2018年，共对1,078名老年人进行了匿名和有效的调查，收集了包括他们家人在内的数据。workplace,社区,社会社会资本和主观幸福感，我们使用结构方程模型来检验变量之间的假设关系。
我们发现，在0-100的范围内，老年参与者的主观幸福感总分为72.36±10.08。家庭（β=0.151，P<0.001），工作场所(β=0.090，P<0.001)，社区（β=0.163，P<0.001）社会资本对主观幸福感有直接的正向影响。社会社会资本对家庭有直接的正向影响(β=0.253,P<0.001),工作场所(β=0.585，P<0.001)，社区社会资本(β=0.438,P<0.001)。社会资本通过家庭的中介作用对主观幸福感产生了间接的正向影响,workplace,社区社会资本。
研究表明，所有的微观，社会资本的中观和宏观层面通过直接或间接的方式对主观幸福感具有保护作用，激励为面向老年人的多层次社会资本提供持续改进措施。
我们发现，在0-100的范围内，老年参与者的主观幸福感总分为72.36±10.08。家庭（β=0.151，P<0.001），工作场所(β=0.090，P<0.001)，社区（β=0.163，P<0.001）社会资本对主观幸福感有直接的正向影响。社会社会资本对家庭有直接的正向影响(β=0.253,P<0.001),工作场所(β=0.585，P<0.001)，社区社会资本(β=0.438,P<0.001)。社会资本通过家庭的中介作用对主观幸福感产生了间接的正向影响,workplace,社区社会资本。
研究表明，所有的微观，社会资本的中观和宏观层面通过直接或间接的方式对主观幸福感具有保护作用，激励为面向老年人的多层次社会资本提供持续改进措施。
