PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: Discuss the implementation effect of cervical cancer comprehensive treatment patients applying whole-course high-quality care combined with network continuation care.
METHODS: From August 2020 to August 2021, 120 patients who met the inclusion criteria for comprehensive treatment of cervical cancer were divided into the regular group (n = 60) who received conventional care and the joint group (n = 60) who received whole-course high-quality care combined with network continuation care, according to the method of care. The comprehensive treatment cognition level, comprehensive treatment compliance, adverse reaction rate, quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) score, self-rating anxiety/depression scale (SAS/SDS) score, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: After care, the comprehensive treatment cognition score and comprehensive treatment compliance score were higher in the joint group than in the regular group (P < 0.05). After care, the incidence of radiation cystitis and radiation proctitis was lower in the joint group than that in the regular group (P < 0.05). After care, QLQ-C30 scores on symptom domains, functional domains, and single questions were higher in both groups than before care, and were higher in the joint group than in the regular group (P < 0.05). After care, SAS and SDS scores were lower in both groups than before care, and were lower in the joint group than in the regular group (P < 0.05). After care, the joint group was more satisfied with care than the regular group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of cervical cancer comprehensive treatment patients with whole-course high-quality care combined with network continuation care has an ideal implementation effect, which can significantly increase the patient\'s cognition and compliance with treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions is less, the quality of life and emotional state have also improved significantly, and care satisfaction has also increased accordingly.
METHODS: From August 2020 to August 2021, 120 patients who met the inclusion criteria for comprehensive treatment of cervical cancer were divided into the regular group (n = 60) who received conventional care and the joint group (n = 60) who received whole-course high-quality care combined with network continuation care, according to the method of care. The comprehensive treatment cognition level, comprehensive treatment compliance, adverse reaction rate, quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) score, self-rating anxiety/depression scale (SAS/SDS) score, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: After care, the comprehensive treatment cognition score and comprehensive treatment compliance score were higher in the joint group than in the regular group (P < 0.05). After care, the incidence of radiation cystitis and radiation proctitis was lower in the joint group than that in the regular group (P < 0.05). After care, QLQ-C30 scores on symptom domains, functional domains, and single questions were higher in both groups than before care, and were higher in the joint group than in the regular group (P < 0.05). After care, SAS and SDS scores were lower in both groups than before care, and were lower in the joint group than in the regular group (P < 0.05). After care, the joint group was more satisfied with care than the regular group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of cervical cancer comprehensive treatment patients with whole-course high-quality care combined with network continuation care has an ideal implementation effect, which can significantly increase the patient\'s cognition and compliance with treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions is less, the quality of life and emotional state have also improved significantly, and care satisfaction has also increased accordingly.
摘要：
目的：探讨宫颈癌综合治疗患者应用全程优质护理联合网络延续护理的实施效果。
方法：2020年8月至2021年8月，将符合宫颈癌综合治疗纳入标准的120例患者分为接受常规护理的常规组（n=60）和接受全程优质护理联合网络延续护理的联合组（n=60），根据护理方法。综合治疗认知水平,综合治疗依从性，不良反应发生率,生活质量问卷（QLQ-C30）评分，焦虑/抑郁自评量表(SAS/SDS)评分,比较两组患者的护理满意度。
结果：护理后，联合组的综合治疗认知评分和综合治疗依从性评分均高于常规组(P<0.05)。护理后,联合组放射性膀胱炎和放射性直肠炎的发生率低于常规组（P<0.05）。护理后,症状域的QLQ-C30评分，功能域，两组的单个问题都比护理前高，关节组高于常规组(P<0.05)。护理后,两组的SAS和SDS评分均低于护理前，关节组低于常规组(P<0.05)。护理后,联合组护理满意度高于常规组(P<0.05)。
结论：对宫颈癌综合治疗患者实施全程优质护理联合网络延续护理具有较为理想的实施效果。这可以显著提高患者的认知和治疗依从性，不良反应发生率较低,生活质量和情绪状态也有了显著改善，护理满意度也相应提高。
方法：2020年8月至2021年8月，将符合宫颈癌综合治疗纳入标准的120例患者分为接受常规护理的常规组（n=60）和接受全程优质护理联合网络延续护理的联合组（n=60），根据护理方法。综合治疗认知水平,综合治疗依从性，不良反应发生率,生活质量问卷（QLQ-C30）评分，焦虑/抑郁自评量表(SAS/SDS)评分,比较两组患者的护理满意度。
结果：护理后，联合组的综合治疗认知评分和综合治疗依从性评分均高于常规组(P<0.05)。护理后,联合组放射性膀胱炎和放射性直肠炎的发生率低于常规组（P<0.05）。护理后,症状域的QLQ-C30评分，功能域，两组的单个问题都比护理前高，关节组高于常规组(P<0.05)。护理后,两组的SAS和SDS评分均低于护理前，关节组低于常规组(P<0.05)。护理后,联合组护理满意度高于常规组(P<0.05)。
结论：对宫颈癌综合治疗患者实施全程优质护理联合网络延续护理具有较为理想的实施效果。这可以显著提高患者的认知和治疗依从性，不良反应发生率较低,生活质量和情绪状态也有了显著改善，护理满意度也相应提高。
