PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
12th Days of the Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina (AMNuBiH) this year were organized together with the International Academy of Sciences and Arts in Bosnia and Herzegovina in Sarajevo on December 4, 2021. The title of the symposium was \"Scientometry, Citation, Plagiarism and Predatory in Scientific Publishing\". Experiences in the scientific area covered by title of this conference were presented by some of the most influential scientists from Bosnia and Herzegovina, who are included between 2% of authors in the Stanford scientometric list, which was published in October 2021 in the journal Biology Plos. Some of the authors are former or current Editors-in-Chiefs of indexed biomedical journals in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, North Macedonia (Izet Masic, Asim Kurjak, Doncho Donev, Osman Sinanovic). Also, Sylwia Ufnalska and Izet Masic are or were members of the European Association of Science Editors (EASE) and they have great experiences about the topic of this conference. Science that analyzes scientific papers and their citation in the scientific journals - called scientometrics - day by day has become important for measuring scientific validity and quality of all kinds of publications deposited in the most important on-line scientific databases, like WoS, Scopus, Medline, PubMed Central, Embase, Hinari, etc., but also in academic platforms ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Scientometrics use the Impact and Echo factor for measuring the quality of publications in WoS journals, Scopus uses the h-Index, and the most common one used in the last 10 years is Google Scholar index. All of them have advantages and disadvantages, and also positive and negative influences in the academic praxis. One of the greatest, and sadly too common, problems which participants in the academic process encountered are plagiarism and predatory publishing. In order to prevent this severest form of academic fraud, authors must give credit to someone whose work has helped him/her by citing references correctly. This presentations of the symposium \"SWEP 2021\") analyzed the major components of scientometrics, the basic mechanisms of citations in medical publications and plagiarism, as an opposition to the primary goal of scientific enterprise: search for truth.
摘要：
今年波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那医学科学院（AMNuBiH）的第12天与波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那国际科学与艺术学院一起于2021年12月4日在萨拉热窝举行。研讨会的标题是“科学计量学，引文,科学出版中的抄袭和掠夺性\“。波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那一些最有影响力的科学家介绍了本次会议标题所涵盖的科学领域的经验，斯坦福科学计量学名单中2%的作者，于2021年10月在《生物学》杂志上发表。一些作者是波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那索引生物医学期刊的前任或现任主编，克罗地亚,北马其顿（IzetMasic，AsimKurjak,DonchoDonev,奥斯曼·西纳诺维奇）。此外，SylwiaUfnalska和IzetMasic是或曾经是欧洲科学编辑协会（EASE）的成员，他们对本次会议的主题有很好的经验。分析科学论文及其在科学期刊上的引用的科学-称为科学计量学-日益成为衡量存储在最重要的在线科学数据库中的各种出版物的科学有效性和质量的重要手段。像WOS一样,Scopus,Medline,PubMedCentral,Embase,Hinari,等。,而且在学术平台研究门和学术界。edu.科学计量学使用影响因子和回声因子来衡量WoS期刊中出版物的质量，Scopus使用h-Index,在过去的10年里，最常用的是谷歌学者索引。它们都有优点和缺点，以及学术实践中的积极和消极影响。一个最伟大的,可悲的是太普通了，学术过程中的参与者遇到的问题是抄袭和掠夺性出版。为了防止这种最严重的学术欺诈形式，作者必须通过正确引用参考文献来赞扬他/她的作品。研讨会“SWEP2021”的演讲)分析了科学计量学的主要组成部分，医学出版物中引用和抄袭的基本机制，反对科学企业的首要目标:寻求真理。
