This multicenter study included 164 patients treated with NAC and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically non-metastatic, high-risk UTUC. The cohort was stratified into two groups according to median age. Patients received either cisplatin-based or non-cisplatin-based chemotherapies. Pathologic responses were defined as pathologic objective response (pOR; ≤ ypT1N0) and pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0N0). Univariable and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for pathologic response and survival outcomes.
The cohorts\' median age was 68 years with the elderly group (> 68 years) comprising 74 patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy included methotrexate-vinblastine-doxorubicin-cisplatin (MVAC) in 66 (40%), gemcitabine cisplatin (GC) in 66 (40%) and non-cisplatin chemotherapy in 32 patients (20%). Younger patients received more often MVAC (50% vs. 28%) while elderly received more GC (34% vs. 47%) or non-cisplatin chemotherapy (16% vs. 24%) (P = .02). Overall, pOR and pCR were similar across age groups (52% vs. 47%; P = .5 and 10% vs. 8%; P = .7). While GC and non-cisplatin chemotherapy showed a lower pCR of 5% and 3%, respectively, MVAC revealed a pCR of 17% (P = .03) and was independently associated with a higher pCR (OR 4.31; P = .03). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival, whereas a lower rate was seen in overall survival for the elderly.
Elderly patients with high-risk UTUC eligible for cisplatin-based NAC prior to RNU may benefit from this multimodal therapy equally as their younger counterparts. Cisplatin-ineligible patients undergoing non-cisplatin-based NAC appeared to have lower response rates and should be considered for immediate RNU.
这项多中心研究包括164例接受NAC和根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)治疗的临床非转移性患者,高风险UTUC。根据中位年龄将队列分为两组。患者接受基于顺铂或非顺铂的化疗。病理反应定义为病理客观反应(pOR;≤ypT1N0)和病理完全反应(pCR;ypT0N0)。进行单变量和多变量logistic和Cox回归分析,以确定病理反应和生存结果的预测因子。
队列的中位年龄为68岁,老年组(>68岁)包括74名患者。新辅助化疗包括甲氨蝶呤-长春碱-多柔比星-顺铂(MVAC)66(40%),吉西他滨顺铂(GC)66例(40%),非顺铂化疗32例(20%)。年轻患者接受MVAC的频率更高(50%vs.28%),而老年人接受更多GC(34%vs.47%)或非顺铂化疗(16%vs.24%)(P=.02)。总的来说,不同年龄段的pOR和pCR相似(52%vs.47%;P=0.5和10%vs.8%;P=.7)。虽然GC和非顺铂化疗显示较低的pCR为5%和3%,分别,MVAC显示pCR为17%(P=0.03),并且与较高的pCR独立相关(OR4.31;P=0.03)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示无复发生存率和癌症特异性生存率无差异。而老年人的总生存率较低。
患有高风险UTUC的老年患者在RNU之前有资格接受基于顺铂的NAC治疗,可能与年轻患者一样受益于这种多模式治疗。顺铂不合格的患者接受非顺铂为基础的NAC似乎有较低的反应率,应考虑立即RNU。