A rapid review of research science literature was carried out to identify in the PubMed/MEDLINE database the proportion of peer-reviewed articles adopting either a RBS or an ABS, in the main global environment fields from January 01, 1900 to December 31, 2019 and, related to COVID-19, from December 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020.
The number of published articles resulting from our search was 1,957,905, including 91.3% with an RBS and 8.7% with an ABS. When examining each field, we found that only 10.5% of human health articles deal with ABS, 5.5% for animal health, 2.2% for ecosystem health, 1.0% for plant health and 2.7% for environmental media. We noted that articles adopting both strategies were published in all health fields. Among the articles concerning COVID-19, 5,854 (55.9%), 542 articles (5.2%) adopted RBS and ABS, respectively, while 4069 (38.9%) simultaneously presenting both strategies.
Our results have allowed us to take stock of the biomedical research strategies prioritized during the twentieth century. It seems highly likely that the two strategies we have analyzed can now be chosen in such a way as to promote a balance in public health measures, at every level to guide One Health interventions aimed at helping people, animals, and plants to lead healthier lives.
对研究科学文献进行了快速审查,以在PubMed/MEDLINE数据库中确定采用RBS或ABS的同行评审文章的比例,在1900年1月1日至2019年12月31日的主要全球环境领域,与COVID-19相关,从2019年12月1日至2020年5月31日。
我们搜索的已发表文章数量为1,957,905,其中RBS占91.3%,ABS占8.7%。检查每个字段时,我们发现只有10.5%的健康文章涉及ABS,动物健康5.5%,生态系统健康2.2%,1.0%用于植物健康,2.7%用于环境介质。我们注意到,所有卫生领域都发表了采用这两种策略的文章。在有关COVID-19的文章中,5854篇(55.9%),542篇(5.2%)采用了RBS和ABS,分别,而4069(38.9%)同时提出两种策略。
我们的研究结果使我们能够评估20世纪优先考虑的生物医学研究策略。我们分析过的这两种策略现在似乎很有可能被选择,以促进公共卫生措施的平衡,在各个层面指导一个健康干预措施,旨在帮助人们,动物,和植物过上更健康的生活。