Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this scoping review was to map clinical-related critical incidents and their implications on undergraduate nursing students.
BACKGROUND: The unpredictability inherent in the clinical learning environment places nursing students at risk of a critical incident that may lead to long-term consequences.
METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework.
METHODS: A search for primary research sources and dissertations was conducted using the CINAHL, PubMed, Dissertation and Thesis Global, and MEDLINE databases. Eligibility criteria included primary research related to undergraduate nursing students who had experienced critical incidents in the clinical setting.
RESULTS: From a total of 66 identified articles, only one met the inclusion criteria. Overall, it was identified that the term \"stress\" was inconsistently defined. Researchers have primarily focused on general stress from academic and experiential learning rather than sudden and unexpected critical incidents underpinned by clinical experiences.
CONCLUSIONS: The scoping review results identify a significant gap in the research relative to clinical-related critical incidents and the associated implications experienced by undergraduate nursing students.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed so that crisis interventions can be prioritized and strategies to enhance resilience can be addressed before graduation.
BACKGROUND: The unpredictability inherent in the clinical learning environment places nursing students at risk of a critical incident that may lead to long-term consequences.
METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework.
METHODS: A search for primary research sources and dissertations was conducted using the CINAHL, PubMed, Dissertation and Thesis Global, and MEDLINE databases. Eligibility criteria included primary research related to undergraduate nursing students who had experienced critical incidents in the clinical setting.
RESULTS: From a total of 66 identified articles, only one met the inclusion criteria. Overall, it was identified that the term \"stress\" was inconsistently defined. Researchers have primarily focused on general stress from academic and experiential learning rather than sudden and unexpected critical incidents underpinned by clinical experiences.
CONCLUSIONS: The scoping review results identify a significant gap in the research relative to clinical-related critical incidents and the associated implications experienced by undergraduate nursing students.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed so that crisis interventions can be prioritized and strategies to enhance resilience can be addressed before graduation.
摘要：
目的：本范围审查的目的是绘制临床相关的危重事件及其对护理本科生的影响。
背景：临床学习环境固有的不可预测性使护生面临可能导致长期后果的重大事件的风险。
方法：使用JoannaBriggs研究所框架进行了范围审查。
方法：使用CINAHL搜索主要研究来源和论文，PubMed,全球论文和论文，和MEDLINE数据库。资格标准包括与在临床环境中经历过严重事件的护理本科生相关的主要研究。
结果：从总共66篇确定的文章中，只有一个符合纳入标准。总的来说,据确定，术语“压力”的定义不一致。研究人员主要关注来自学术和体验式学习的一般压力，而不是以临床经验为基础的突然和意外的重大事件。
结论：范围审查结果发现，与临床相关的危重事件和护理本科生经历的相关影响相关的研究存在显著差距。
结论：需要进一步的研究，以便在毕业前优先考虑危机干预措施，并制定增强复原力的策略。
背景：临床学习环境固有的不可预测性使护生面临可能导致长期后果的重大事件的风险。
方法：使用JoannaBriggs研究所框架进行了范围审查。
方法：使用CINAHL搜索主要研究来源和论文，PubMed,全球论文和论文，和MEDLINE数据库。资格标准包括与在临床环境中经历过严重事件的护理本科生相关的主要研究。
结果：从总共66篇确定的文章中，只有一个符合纳入标准。总的来说,据确定，术语“压力”的定义不一致。研究人员主要关注来自学术和体验式学习的一般压力，而不是以临床经验为基础的突然和意外的重大事件。
结论：范围审查结果发现，与临床相关的危重事件和护理本科生经历的相关影响相关的研究存在显著差距。
结论：需要进一步的研究，以便在毕业前优先考虑危机干预措施，并制定增强复原力的策略。
