PDF(Sci-hub)
Abstract：
There has been vigorous debate on how different countries responded to the COVID-19 pandemic. To secure public safety, South Korea actively used personal information at the risk of personal privacy whereas France encouraged voluntary cooperation at the risk of public safety. In this article, after a brief comparison of contextual differences with France, we focus on South Korea\'s approaches to epidemiological investigations. To evaluate the issues pertaining to personal privacy and public health, we examine the usage patterns of original data, de-identification data, and encrypted data. Our specific proposal discusses the COVID index, which considers collective infection, outbreak intensity, availability of medical infrastructure, and the death rate. Finally, we summarize the findings and lessons for future research and the policy implications.
摘要：
关于不同国家如何应对COVID-19大流行，一直存在激烈的辩论。为了确保公共安全，韩国在个人隐私风险下积极使用个人信息，而法国在公共安全风险下鼓励自愿合作。在这篇文章中,在与法国进行了上下文差异的简短比较之后，我们关注韩国的流行病学调查方法。为了评估与个人隐私和公共卫生有关的问题，我们检查原始数据的使用模式，去识别数据，和加密的数据。我们的具体建议讨论了COVID指数，考虑到集体感染，爆发强度，医疗基础设施的可用性，和死亡率。最后,我们总结了未来研究的发现和教训以及政策含义。
