关键词: Surgical techniques classic piggyback early allograft dysfunction liver transplantation (LT) outflow venous obstruction

来  源:   DOI:10.21037/atm-21-1945   PDF(Pubmed)

Abstract:
UNASSIGNED: Surgical techniques of liver transplantation have continually evolved and have been modified. We retrospectively analyzed a single-center case series and compared the advantages and disadvantages of each method.
UNASSIGNED: Six-hundred and seventy-four recipients\' perioperative data were assessed and analyzed stratified by different surgical technics [modified classic (MC), modified piggyback (MPB) and classic piggyback (CPB)].
UNASSIGNED: MELD score and Child-Pugh scores was significantly higher in CPB groups (P=0.008 and 0.003, respectively). Anhepatic time in MPB group was longer than those in CPB group (P<0.05). The operation duration in MPB group was significantly longer than those in MC group and CPB group (P=0.003). Three patients had outflow obstruction (P=0.035). The overall survival in MPB group were better than those in MC group and CPB group in general comparison (P<0.001). In patients with preoperative creatine >120 µmol/L, the overall survival in MC group was worst (P<0.001). In patients with a high MELD score (>24), the overall survival in MPB group tended to be the best (P<0.001).
UNASSIGNED: The advantages and disadvantages are different for these three surgical techniques. A reasonable operation technique should be adopted considering the patient\'s unique condition to ensure the stability of hemodynamics.
摘要:
暂无翻译
公众号