PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Community resilience (CR) has gradually become a hot topic in uncertain times, especially in the last five years. The current study presents a systematic review based on content analysis to present a knowledge graph of CR research over the last 20 years.
METHODS: We use an approach of Leximancer to conduct the content analysis to explore the intellectual foundations, research context, topics, and methods of CR literature based on 583 published studies.
RESULTS: The results show that framework research of CR is a hot topic throughout the last 20 years. In the first stage (from 2001 to 2015), CR connected with the themes of \"framework, disaster, change, and model\". Comparatively, in the second stage (from 2016 to 2020), the themes of \"social capital, capacity, and framework\" are more salient connecting with CR. Additionally, the study detected that the key issues varied across countries. Specifically, research in the US focused on the social support dynamic, while in Australia, recovery from the disaster was the predominant theme. Furthermore, in the UK, studies mostly explore resilience issues in the background related to flooding.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a comprehensive picture of CR research covering the last 20 years and put forward thoughts and recommendations for future resilience studies considering 1) obstacles within daily life, 2) resilience set within organizational perspectives, and 3) cultural context.
METHODS: We use an approach of Leximancer to conduct the content analysis to explore the intellectual foundations, research context, topics, and methods of CR literature based on 583 published studies.
RESULTS: The results show that framework research of CR is a hot topic throughout the last 20 years. In the first stage (from 2001 to 2015), CR connected with the themes of \"framework, disaster, change, and model\". Comparatively, in the second stage (from 2016 to 2020), the themes of \"social capital, capacity, and framework\" are more salient connecting with CR. Additionally, the study detected that the key issues varied across countries. Specifically, research in the US focused on the social support dynamic, while in Australia, recovery from the disaster was the predominant theme. Furthermore, in the UK, studies mostly explore resilience issues in the background related to flooding.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a comprehensive picture of CR research covering the last 20 years and put forward thoughts and recommendations for future resilience studies considering 1) obstacles within daily life, 2) resilience set within organizational perspectives, and 3) cultural context.
摘要：
背景：社区复原力（CR）在不确定时期逐渐成为热门话题，尤其是在过去的五年里。当前的研究提出了基于内容分析的系统综述，以呈现过去20年的CR研究知识图。
方法：我们使用Leximancer的方法进行内容分析，以探索知识基础，研究背景，主题,基于583项已发表研究的CR文献和方法。
结果：结果表明，在过去的20年中，CR的框架研究一直是热门话题。在第一阶段（从2001年到2015年），CR与“框架”的主题联系在一起，灾难,改变,和型号“。相对而言,在第二阶段(2016年至2020年)，“社会资本”的主题，容量,和框架“与CR的联系更加突出。此外,这项研究发现，关键问题因国家而异。具体来说,美国的研究集中在社会支持动态上，在澳大利亚,从灾难中恢复是主要主题。此外，在英国,研究大多探讨与洪水相关的背景下的弹性问题。
结论：我们的发现提供了涵盖过去20年的CR研究的全面情况，并为考虑1）日常生活中的障碍的未来弹性研究提出了想法和建议，2)在组织视角内设置的弹性，3)文化背景。
方法：我们使用Leximancer的方法进行内容分析，以探索知识基础，研究背景，主题,基于583项已发表研究的CR文献和方法。
结果：结果表明，在过去的20年中，CR的框架研究一直是热门话题。在第一阶段（从2001年到2015年），CR与“框架”的主题联系在一起，灾难,改变,和型号“。相对而言,在第二阶段(2016年至2020年)，“社会资本”的主题，容量,和框架“与CR的联系更加突出。此外,这项研究发现，关键问题因国家而异。具体来说,美国的研究集中在社会支持动态上，在澳大利亚,从灾难中恢复是主要主题。此外，在英国,研究大多探讨与洪水相关的背景下的弹性问题。
结论：我们的发现提供了涵盖过去20年的CR研究的全面情况，并为考虑1）日常生活中的障碍的未来弹性研究提出了想法和建议，2)在组织视角内设置的弹性，3)文化背景。
