Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to analyse the coexistence of several delusional misidentification syndromes in a clinical sample.
METHODS: Over one year, a sample of six patients presenting two or more types of delusional misidentification syndromes was selected. All these patients were admitted to the psychiatric inpatient unit of a Spanish hospital.
RESULTS: Despite the different diagnoses, the patients included presented different types of delusional misidentification syndromes, both hyperidentification and hypoidentification. Antipsychotic treatment was not very effective against these delusional misidentification syndromes CONCLUSIONS: The coexistence of several delusional misidentification syndromes indicates that the aetiopathogenesis of the different types is similar. It is a field with important clinical implications, due to the poor response to treatment, as well as the possible medico-legal implications.
METHODS: Over one year, a sample of six patients presenting two or more types of delusional misidentification syndromes was selected. All these patients were admitted to the psychiatric inpatient unit of a Spanish hospital.
RESULTS: Despite the different diagnoses, the patients included presented different types of delusional misidentification syndromes, both hyperidentification and hypoidentification. Antipsychotic treatment was not very effective against these delusional misidentification syndromes CONCLUSIONS: The coexistence of several delusional misidentification syndromes indicates that the aetiopathogenesis of the different types is similar. It is a field with important clinical implications, due to the poor response to treatment, as well as the possible medico-legal implications.
摘要：
目的：本研究的目的是分析临床样本中几种妄想误认综合征的共存。
方法：一年以上，我们选取了6例存在两种或两种以上妄想症的患者样本.所有这些患者都被送往西班牙医院的精神病住院病房。
结果：尽管诊断不同，包括的患者表现出不同类型的妄想症错误识别综合征，既是超识别又是超识别。抗精神病药物治疗对这些妄想症误认综合征并不是很有效。结论：几种妄想症误认综合征的共存表明不同类型的病因是相似的。这是一个具有重要临床意义的领域，由于对治疗的反应不佳，以及可能的医疗法律影响。
方法：一年以上，我们选取了6例存在两种或两种以上妄想症的患者样本.所有这些患者都被送往西班牙医院的精神病住院病房。
结果：尽管诊断不同，包括的患者表现出不同类型的妄想症错误识别综合征，既是超识别又是超识别。抗精神病药物治疗对这些妄想症误认综合征并不是很有效。结论：几种妄想症误认综合征的共存表明不同类型的病因是相似的。这是一个具有重要临床意义的领域，由于对治疗的反应不佳，以及可能的医疗法律影响。
