PDF(Sci-hub)
Abstract：
The use of reporting terminologies for thyroid FNA cytology enables standardisation and international alignment of the reporting of thyroid cytology results, which is essential. There are currently three major internationally recognised systems: Bethesda (TBS), UK RCPath (Thy), and Italian (TIR). A fourth terminology system used in Japan has identical categories to TBS but with different nomenclature. The aim of this review is to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the TBS, UK RCPath, and TIR systems, and to make the case for international terminology harmonisation and standardisation.
摘要：
使用甲状腺FNA细胞学的报告术语可以使甲状腺细胞学结果的报告标准化和国际一致性。这是必不可少的。目前有三个主要的国际公认的系统：贝塞斯达（TBS），英国RCPath（你的），意大利（TIR）在日本使用的第四术语系统具有与TBS相同的类别,但具有不同的命名法。这篇综述的目的是讨论TBS的优缺点，英国RCPath,和TIR系统，并为国际术语协调和标准化辩护。
