PDF(Sci-hub)
Abstract：
The assessment of intimate partner violence (IPV) by mental health, medical, and criminal justice practitioners occurs routinely. The validity of the assessment instrument they use impacts practitioners\' ability to judge ongoing risk, establish the type of IPV occurring, protect potential victims, and intervene effectively. Yet, there is no known compendium of existing assessment measures. The purpose of this article is threefold: (1) to present a systematic review of measures used to identify or predict IPV, (2) to determine which of these measures have psychometric evidence to support their use, and (3) to determine whether any existing measure is capable of differentiating between situational couple violence and intimate terrorism. A systematic search was conducted using PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PubMed, and MEDLINE. Studies on the reliability or validity of specific measures of IPV were included, regardless of format, length, discipline, or type of IPV assessed. A total of 222 studies, on the psychometric properties of 87 unique measures, met our a priori criteria and were included in the review. We described the reliability and validity of the 87 measures. We rated the measures based on the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments-revised criteria and other established validity criteria, which allowed us to generate a list of recommended measures. We also discussed measures designed to differentiate IPV types. We conclude by describing the strengths and weaknesses of existing measures and by suggesting new avenues for researchers to enhance the assessment of IPV.
摘要：
通过心理健康评估亲密伴侣暴力（IPV），medical,刑事司法从业人员经常发生。他们使用的评估工具的有效性会影响从业人员判断持续风险的能力，确定发生IPV的类型，保护潜在的受害者,并进行有效干预。然而，没有已知的现有评估措施汇编。本文的目的有三个：（1）对用于识别或预测IPV的措施进行系统的回顾，（2）确定这些措施中的哪些具有支持其使用的心理测量证据，和（3）确定任何现有措施是否能够区分情境性夫妻暴力和亲密恐怖主义。使用PsycINFO进行了系统搜索，心术,PubMed,和MEDLINE。包括IPV具体措施的信度或效度研究，无论格式如何，长度,纪律,或评估的IPV类型。共222项研究，关于87种独特度量的心理测量学特性，符合我们的先验标准，并被纳入审查。我们描述了87项措施的信度和效度。我们根据《基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准》修订的标准和其他既定的有效性标准对措施进行了评级，这使我们能够生成建议措施的列表。我们还讨论了旨在区分IPV类型的措施。最后，我们描述了现有措施的优缺点，并为研究人员提出了加强IPV评估的新途径。
