Triphasic abdominal SDCT was performed in 25 patients including TNC, arterial and venous phase. VMI40keV and VNC were reconstructed from the venous phase and compared to conventional arterial-phase images (CIart), TNC and conventional venous-phase images (CIven). Vessel contrast and virtual contrast removal were analyzed with region-of-interest-based measurements and in a qualitative assessment.
Quantitative analysis revealed no significant attenuation differences between TNC and VNC in arterial vessels (p-range 0.07-0.47) except for the renal artery (p = 0.011). For venous vessels, significant differences between TNC and VNC were found for all veins (p < 0.001) except the inferior vena cava (p = 0.26), yet these differences remained within a 10 HU range in most patients. No significant attenuation differences were found between CIart/VMI40keV in arterial vessels (p-range 0.06-0.86). Contrast-to-noise ratio provided by VMI40keV and CIart was equivalent for all arterial vessels assessed (p-range 0.14-0.91). Qualitatively, VMI40keV showed similar enhancement of abdominal and pelvic arteries as CIart and VNC were rated comparable to TNC.
Our study suggests that VNC and VMI40keV derived from single venous-phase SDCT offer comparable assessment of major abdominal vessels as provided by routine triphasic examinations, if no dynamic contrast information is required.