METHODS: In this descriptive, analytical, cross-sectional study, 525 subjects were selected as the sample population using the two-stage cluster sampling. For data collection, a researcher-made questionnaire was used, whose content validity and reliability were confirmed (r = 0.71). The study screened the data received and analyzed valid data set through the ttest and Spearman\'s correlation coefficient by incorporating SPSS Statistics software version 23.0. In addition, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The 2015 CPR literacy levels of the samples were as follows: excellent (85 subjects or 16.2%), good (404 subjects or 77%), and average (36 subjects or 6.9%). The results of Pearson\'s correlation coefficient revealed a weak and inverse relationship between the levels of CPR literacy and the age of samples (r = -0.092) and work experience (-0.029), which were statistically significant. In addition, the results of Mann-Whitney U-test demonstrated that the level of CPR literacy among the personnel of Ahwaz University of Medical Sciences exceeded that among the personnel of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that in retraining the nursing and paramedical personnel, CPR be carried out with more emphasis on the changes introduced in this guideline compared to that in 2010, including esophageal tracheal airway, reasons for the cessation of CPR, intraosseous infusion, and induced hypothermia.
方法:在此描述中,分析,横断面研究,采用两阶段整群抽样方法选择525名受试者作为样本人群。对于数据收集,使用了研究人员制作的问卷,其内容效度和信度得到证实(r=0.71)。本研究采用SPSSStatistics软件23.0版,通过tttest和Spearman相关系数对收到的数据进行筛选,并对有效数据集进行分析。此外,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
结果:样本的2015年CPR素养水平如下:优秀(85名受试者或16.2%),良好(404科目或77%),和平均水平(36名受试者或6.9%)。皮尔逊相关系数的结果表明,CPR素养水平与样本年龄(r=-0.092)和工作经验(-0.029)之间存在微弱的负相关关系,具有统计学意义。此外,Mann-WhitneyU检验结果表明,Ahwaz医科大学人员的CPR素养水平超过了Kermanshah医科大学人员的CPR素养水平(P<0.001)。
结论:建议在对护理和辅助医务人员进行再培训时,与2010年相比,心肺复苏术更强调本指南中引入的变化,包括食管气管气道,停止心肺复苏的原因,骨内输注,诱导体温过低.