Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: Bibliometrics makes it possible to measure the relative importance of a scientific journal in its field. The current study analyzed the scientific publications in Radiología and the bibliometric parameters of the journal in the period comprising 2010 through 2019.
METHODS: We reviewed the bibliometrics for Radiología through information obtained from three sources: Scopus, the online version of the journal, and the publisher (Elsevier). We retrospectively analyzed aspects related to the editorial process (final decision and speed), the articles published (type, subspecialty of radiology, and imaging technique), the trends in citation and various indices (CiteScore, SNIP, and SJR), visibility, downloads, author characteristics (geographical origin and institutional collaboration), and the most cited articles.
RESULTS: The number of articles published in Radiología gradually decreased during the decade, and the time to publication increased. Original research articles account for the largest share of the articles published. The most common subject areas were radiology of the digestive tract and neuroradiology. Nevertheless, the bibliometric indicators and the number of downloads of articles increased every year. Regarding the authorship of the articles published, although authors from Spain predominate, the participation of authors from other countries became increasingly common. Collaboration among different institutions also became increasingly common in the period analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: This review shows the progression of the journal\'s scientific work and some aspects that must be addressed to favor the growth of Radiología.
METHODS: We reviewed the bibliometrics for Radiología through information obtained from three sources: Scopus, the online version of the journal, and the publisher (Elsevier). We retrospectively analyzed aspects related to the editorial process (final decision and speed), the articles published (type, subspecialty of radiology, and imaging technique), the trends in citation and various indices (CiteScore, SNIP, and SJR), visibility, downloads, author characteristics (geographical origin and institutional collaboration), and the most cited articles.
RESULTS: The number of articles published in Radiología gradually decreased during the decade, and the time to publication increased. Original research articles account for the largest share of the articles published. The most common subject areas were radiology of the digestive tract and neuroradiology. Nevertheless, the bibliometric indicators and the number of downloads of articles increased every year. Regarding the authorship of the articles published, although authors from Spain predominate, the participation of authors from other countries became increasingly common. Collaboration among different institutions also became increasingly common in the period analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: This review shows the progression of the journal\'s scientific work and some aspects that must be addressed to favor the growth of Radiología.
摘要：
目的：文献计量学可以衡量科学期刊在其领域的相对重要性。当前的研究分析了2010年至2019年期间Radiologia的科学出版物和该期刊的文献计量参数。
方法：我们通过从三个来源获得的信息回顾了Radiologia的文献计量学：Scopus，杂志的网络版，和出版商（Elsevier）。我们回顾性分析了与编辑过程相关的方面(最终决定和速度)，发表的文章(类型，放射学专科，和成像技术)，引文和各种指数的趋势(CiteScore，SNIP,和SJR），可见性,下载,作者特征(地理来源和机构合作)，引用最多的文章。
结果：十年来，在Radiologia发表的文章数量逐渐减少，出版时间增加了。原创研究文章占已发表文章的最大份额。最常见的主题领域是消化道放射学和神经放射学。然而，文献计量指标和文章下载数量每年都在增加。关于发表的文章的作者身份，尽管来自西班牙的作者占主导地位，来自其他国家的作者的参与变得越来越普遍。在所分析的时期，不同机构之间的合作也变得越来越普遍。
结论：这篇综述显示了该杂志的科学工作的进展以及为促进Radiologia的发展必须解决的一些方面。
方法：我们通过从三个来源获得的信息回顾了Radiologia的文献计量学：Scopus，杂志的网络版，和出版商（Elsevier）。我们回顾性分析了与编辑过程相关的方面(最终决定和速度)，发表的文章(类型，放射学专科，和成像技术)，引文和各种指数的趋势(CiteScore，SNIP,和SJR），可见性,下载,作者特征(地理来源和机构合作)，引用最多的文章。
结果：十年来，在Radiologia发表的文章数量逐渐减少，出版时间增加了。原创研究文章占已发表文章的最大份额。最常见的主题领域是消化道放射学和神经放射学。然而，文献计量指标和文章下载数量每年都在增加。关于发表的文章的作者身份，尽管来自西班牙的作者占主导地位，来自其他国家的作者的参与变得越来越普遍。在所分析的时期，不同机构之间的合作也变得越来越普遍。
结论：这篇综述显示了该杂志的科学工作的进展以及为促进Radiologia的发展必须解决的一些方面。
