PDF(Sci-hub)
Abstract：
The study aimed to describe genotype-phenotype associations in patients with oculocutaneous and ocular-only albinism and to evaluate a set of diagnostic criteria proposed recently by Kruijt et al.
Genotype-phenotype associations in patients with a clinical diagnosis of albinism were studied based on imaging of hair and ocular features (nystagmus, iris color and translucency, fundus pigmentation and foveal development) and self-evaluated skin type. Patients were sub-grouped based on genetic findings.
Patients with biallelic variants in TYR (n = 29), OCA2 (n = 22), other albinism genes (n = 13) or monoallelic variants in GPR143 (n = 13) were included as were 15 patients with a pure clinical diagnosis but no genetic findings. In descending order the most common findings were: foveal hypoplasia (any hypoplasia 95.2%, severe 88.0%), nystagmus (93.5%), iris translucency (any translucency 80.2%, moderate to severe 31.5%), misrouting on VEP (80.0%): fundus hypopigmentation (any hypopigmentation: 75.8%, severe 30.1%), fair skin type (73.8%), blue irides (62.0%), blonde hair (57.5%), and unpigmented eye lashes (39.1%). There were no phenotypic differences between the different genetic subgroups of albinism but patients with a pathogenic haplotype in TYR in combination with a classic variant had less iris translucency than patients with two classic variants in TYR.
Ocular developmental features were the most common findings whereas phenotypic features related to pigmentation were less common findings but there were no genotype-phenotype correlations. All patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of albinism fulfilled the diagnostic criteria by Kruijt irrespective of genetic subtype.
Genotype-phenotype associations in patients with a clinical diagnosis of albinism were studied based on imaging of hair and ocular features (nystagmus, iris color and translucency, fundus pigmentation and foveal development) and self-evaluated skin type. Patients were sub-grouped based on genetic findings.
Patients with biallelic variants in TYR (n = 29), OCA2 (n = 22), other albinism genes (n = 13) or monoallelic variants in GPR143 (n = 13) were included as were 15 patients with a pure clinical diagnosis but no genetic findings. In descending order the most common findings were: foveal hypoplasia (any hypoplasia 95.2%, severe 88.0%), nystagmus (93.5%), iris translucency (any translucency 80.2%, moderate to severe 31.5%), misrouting on VEP (80.0%): fundus hypopigmentation (any hypopigmentation: 75.8%, severe 30.1%), fair skin type (73.8%), blue irides (62.0%), blonde hair (57.5%), and unpigmented eye lashes (39.1%). There were no phenotypic differences between the different genetic subgroups of albinism but patients with a pathogenic haplotype in TYR in combination with a classic variant had less iris translucency than patients with two classic variants in TYR.
Ocular developmental features were the most common findings whereas phenotypic features related to pigmentation were less common findings but there were no genotype-phenotype correlations. All patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of albinism fulfilled the diagnostic criteria by Kruijt irrespective of genetic subtype.
摘要：
暂无翻译
