METHODS: We report a spectacular case of sledge hammer impalement in the neck where the patient was transfixed, albeit to a small object, requiring movement of the patient and the transfixing object as a single unit.
CONCLUSIONS: The patient was fixed to the head of the sledge hammer because he was unable to move with the heavy pendant.
CONCLUSIONS: We argue that transfixion injuries should be defined in terms of weight of the object in relation to the patient\'s weight and the ability of the patient to move (with) the impaling object.
方法:我们报告了一个壮观的病例,患者被固定在颈部,尽管是一个小物体,需要移动的病人和平移对象作为一个单一的单位。
结论:患者被固定在大锤的头部,因为他无法与沉重的吊坠一起移动。
结论:我们认为,应根据物体重量与患者体重的关系以及患者移动(与)穿刺物体的能力来定义穿透损伤。