PDF(Sci-hub)
Abstract：
The aim of this article is to investigate, study, and summarize cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-related guidelines offered by relevant organizations and associations within North America to provide the dental practitioner a clearer direction on the practice of CBCT-related procedures in North America.
Scientific databases including PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, MedLine, and Web of Science were used for the search of relevant literature on the CBCT guidelines developed in North America. In addition, the World Wide Web was searched for comparative CBCT guidelines nationally or internationally using the same search strategies.
In 1999, the American Dental Association (ADA) recognized Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology as the ninth dental specialty in the United States. The American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (AAOMR) issued their first statement on the use of CBCT in 2008. There have since been several statements issued, independently or jointly with other specialty organizations, related to the use and interpretation of the CBCT volumes. The guidelines identified Oral and Maxillofacial Radiologists (OMR) as providers of interpretative services, portrayed as key players in the dissemination of information related to CBCT, implementation of CBCT-related services and radiation protection, as well as interpretation assistance for CBCT volumes, especially medium to large volumes covering anatomical areas of head and neck, considered beyond the scope of a general dentist. Regulations concerning radiation-producing devices are promulgated through state health codes and practice acts. Selection criteria and interpretation of imaging studies are left to the clinician\'s choice and abilities.
Scientific databases including PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, MedLine, and Web of Science were used for the search of relevant literature on the CBCT guidelines developed in North America. In addition, the World Wide Web was searched for comparative CBCT guidelines nationally or internationally using the same search strategies.
In 1999, the American Dental Association (ADA) recognized Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology as the ninth dental specialty in the United States. The American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (AAOMR) issued their first statement on the use of CBCT in 2008. There have since been several statements issued, independently or jointly with other specialty organizations, related to the use and interpretation of the CBCT volumes. The guidelines identified Oral and Maxillofacial Radiologists (OMR) as providers of interpretative services, portrayed as key players in the dissemination of information related to CBCT, implementation of CBCT-related services and radiation protection, as well as interpretation assistance for CBCT volumes, especially medium to large volumes covering anatomical areas of head and neck, considered beyond the scope of a general dentist. Regulations concerning radiation-producing devices are promulgated through state health codes and practice acts. Selection criteria and interpretation of imaging studies are left to the clinician\'s choice and abilities.
摘要：
本文的目的是调查，study,并总结了北美相关组织和协会提供的锥形束计算机断层扫描（CBCT）相关指南，为牙科医生在北美实施CBCT相关程序提供了更清晰的指导。
科学数据库，包括PubMed，科学直接，Scopus,MedLine,和WebofScience用于搜索有关北美开发的CBCT指南的相关文献。此外,使用相同的搜索策略在国家或国际范围内搜索了万维网的比较CBCT指南.
1999年，美国牙科协会（ADA）将口腔和颌面放射学认可为美国的第九个牙科专业。美国口腔颌面放射学学会（AAOMR）于2008年发表了关于使用CBCT的第一份声明。此后发表了几项声明，独立或与其他专业组织联合，与CBCT卷的使用和解释有关。该指南将口腔颌面放射科医师（OMR）确定为解释性服务的提供者，被描述为传播与CBCT有关的信息的关键参与者，实施CBCT相关服务和辐射防护，以及CBCT卷的解释援助，尤其是覆盖头部和颈部解剖区域的中至大体积，被认为超出了普通牙医的范围。通过州卫生法规和实践法颁布了有关辐射产生设备的法规。影像学研究的选择标准和解释取决于临床医生的选择和能力。
科学数据库，包括PubMed，科学直接，Scopus,MedLine,和WebofScience用于搜索有关北美开发的CBCT指南的相关文献。此外,使用相同的搜索策略在国家或国际范围内搜索了万维网的比较CBCT指南.
1999年，美国牙科协会（ADA）将口腔和颌面放射学认可为美国的第九个牙科专业。美国口腔颌面放射学学会（AAOMR）于2008年发表了关于使用CBCT的第一份声明。此后发表了几项声明，独立或与其他专业组织联合，与CBCT卷的使用和解释有关。该指南将口腔颌面放射科医师（OMR）确定为解释性服务的提供者，被描述为传播与CBCT有关的信息的关键参与者，实施CBCT相关服务和辐射防护，以及CBCT卷的解释援助，尤其是覆盖头部和颈部解剖区域的中至大体积，被认为超出了普通牙医的范围。通过州卫生法规和实践法颁布了有关辐射产生设备的法规。影像学研究的选择标准和解释取决于临床医生的选择和能力。
