Clinical outcomes and structural integrity of arthroscopic double-row versus suture-bridge repair for rotator cuff tears.

关节镜下双排与缝合桥修复肩袖撕裂的临床疗效和结构完整性。

• 发表时间: Jun 2018
• 来源期刊: J Orthop
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.012
• PMID: 29881162
• 文章类型: Journal Article
• 作者列表: Hashiguchi H,Iwashita S,Sonoki K,Abe K,Yoneda M,Takai S

关键词: Case series; Double row repair; Level Ⅳ; Repair integrity; Retear; Rotator cuff tear; Suture bridge repair; Treatment study

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and retear rate between arthroscopic double row (DR) and suture bridge (SB) repair for rotator cuff tears. Postoperative Constant score and MRI findings were compared between 52 patients underwent DR repair and 63 patients underwent SB repair with medium tear of the supraspinatus. There was no significant difference in Constant score between the two groups. Postoperative MRI revealed that retear rate of SB group was significantly lower than DR group. This study suggests that SB repair can provide better clinical and structural outcomes compared with DR repair.

摘要

这项研究的目的是比较关节镜双排（DR）和缝合桥（SB）修复肩袖撕裂的临床效果和再撕裂率。比较了52例接受DR修复的患者和63例接受SB修复的中度冈上肌撕裂的患者的术后Constant评分和MRI表现。两组的Constant评分差异无统计学意义。术后MRI显示SB组再撕裂率明显低于DR组。这项研究表明，与DR修复相比，SB修复可以提供更好的临床和结构结果。