METHODS: Articles were limited to English language, ages 0-21years, and publish date 2006-2015.
METHODS: The search yielded 22 articles. Ten were excluded as the population was primarily adult or lacked discussion of a FRAT. Critical appraisal and findings were synthesized using the Johns Hopkins Nursing evidence appraisal system.
RESULTS: Twelve articles relevant to fall prevention in the pediatric hospital setting that discussed fall risk assessment and use of a FRAT were reviewed. Comparison between and accuracy of FRATs is challenged when different classifications, definitions, risk stratification, and inclusion criteria are used.
CONCLUSIONS: Though there are several pediatric FRATs published in the literature, none have been found to be reliable and valid across institutions and diverse populations.
CONCLUSIONS: This integrative review highlights the importance of choosing a FRAT based on an institution\'s identified risk factors and validating the tool for one\'s own patient population as well as using the tool in conjunction with nursing clinical judgment to guide interventions.