Abstract：
BACKGROUND: External ventricular drainage (EVD) is frequently used in different groups of patients in neurocritical care. Despite the frequent use of EVD, no consensus regarding the diagnosis of EVD-related infection currently exists, and diagnosis is commonly based on criteria for the diagnosis of non-EVD-related CNS infections. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of clinical and laboratory parameters for the prediction of EVD-related infection in patients with proven EVD-related infection.
METHODS: In two tertiary care centers, data on EVD insertions were matched with a microbiologic database of cultured microorganisms and positive Gram stains of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to identify patients with EVD-related infections. Available clinical data and results of blood tests and CSF analysis were retrospectively collected. Predefined potential clinical and laboratory predictors of EVD-related infection were compared between three time points: at the time EVD insertion and 48 h before and at the time of occurrence of EVD-related infection.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with EVD-associated infection defined by positive CSF culture or positive CSF Gram stains and concomitant clinical signs of infection were identified. At the time of infection, a significantly higher incidence of abnormal temperature, high respiratory rate, and a slightly but significantly higher incidence of decreased mental state were observed. The assessed blood and CSF parameters did not significantly differ between the different assessment time points.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of 39 patients with culture positive EVD-related infection showed that commonly used clinical and laboratory parameters are not reliable infection predictors.
METHODS: In two tertiary care centers, data on EVD insertions were matched with a microbiologic database of cultured microorganisms and positive Gram stains of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to identify patients with EVD-related infections. Available clinical data and results of blood tests and CSF analysis were retrospectively collected. Predefined potential clinical and laboratory predictors of EVD-related infection were compared between three time points: at the time EVD insertion and 48 h before and at the time of occurrence of EVD-related infection.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with EVD-associated infection defined by positive CSF culture or positive CSF Gram stains and concomitant clinical signs of infection were identified. At the time of infection, a significantly higher incidence of abnormal temperature, high respiratory rate, and a slightly but significantly higher incidence of decreased mental state were observed. The assessed blood and CSF parameters did not significantly differ between the different assessment time points.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of 39 patients with culture positive EVD-related infection showed that commonly used clinical and laboratory parameters are not reliable infection predictors.
摘要：
暂无翻译
