METHODS: This review summarizes level III evidence from 1995 to 2009 obtained from PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, and the Internet. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and controlled trials published in peer-reviewed journals were retrieved for appraisal. The keywords searched were Pilates and core stabilization.
RESULTS: Ninety articles were identified in MEDLINE and CINAHL; 9 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria for level III evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a scientific basis for the effectiveness of Pilates exercise, with limited evidence to support it as a rehabilitative intervention.
方法:这篇综述总结了1995年至2009年从PubMed(MEDLINE)获得的III级证据,CINAHL,和互联网。荟萃分析,系统评价,随机对照试验,并检索发表在同行评审期刊上的对照试验进行评估.搜索的关键词是普拉提和核心稳定。
结果:在MEDLINE和CINAHL中确定了90篇文章;9篇文章满足III级证据的纳入标准。
结论:普拉提运动的有效性是有科学依据的,支持它作为康复干预的证据有限。